2022
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.16118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of raised body mass index in paediatric sickle cell disease

Abstract: Aim Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) have historically weighed less than their healthy peers. More recently, a retrospective chart review from six institutions in New England reported nearly one‐quarter of children and adolescents with SCD had raised body mass index (BMI). This study aimed to examine rates of children with SCD with raised BMI in Mississippi compared to state and national norms and assess the correlation between haemoglobin and BMI. Methods A retrospective chart review of paediatric pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Body mass index (BMI) showed that 62% of the patients were underweight, while the remaining patients had a normal BMI. Contrasting results were found in the study conducted by Jackson et al, which revealed raised BMI [10].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Body mass index (BMI) showed that 62% of the patients were underweight, while the remaining patients had a normal BMI. Contrasting results were found in the study conducted by Jackson et al, which revealed raised BMI [10].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Confounding conditions included congenital malformations, brain injury, seizure, technology dependence, cancer, eosinophilic esophagitis or milk protein intolerance, malabsorption syndrome or lactose intolerance, and hypothyroidism or growth hormone deficiency, and other conditions that grouped together conditions with fewer than 100 individuals into 1 category (eTable 2 in Supplement 1). Fisher exact test showed pairwise correlation coefficients to be less than 0.7 for all conditions; hence, no further action was required to account for multicollinearity (eTable 3 in Supplement 1). We performed sensitivity analysis by adjusting for 2 additional conditions—eating disorders and psychiatric conditions—along with 9 conditions used in the fully adjusted model and presented the results of Fisher exact test (eTable 4 in Supplement 1) and marginal cost estimates (eTable 5 in Supplement 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in Supplement 1). [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Fisher exact test showed pairwise correlation coefficients to be less than 0.7 for all conditions; hence, no further action was required to account for multicollinearity (eTable 3 in Supplement 1). We performed sensitivity analysis by adjusting for 2 additional conditions-eating disorders and psychiatric conditions-along with 9 conditions used in the fully adjusted model and presented the results of Fisher exact test (eTable 4 in Supplement 1) and marginal cost estimates (eTable 5 in Supplement 1).…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%