2020
DOI: 10.17925/ee.2020.16.2.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Primary Non-adherence with Insulin and Barriers to Insulin Initiation in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus – An Exploratory Study in a Tertiary Care Teaching Public Hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among patients receiving insulin, 6/240 (3%) scored ≥ 3 on items “I am afraid of injecting myself” and “I’m afraid to prick my finger” using the Barriers to Diabetes Questionnaire, indicating “serious problems” with needles [ 47 ]. A study utilising face-face interviews examined the prevalence of primary non-adherence with insulin and barriers to insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes [ 51 ]. This study revealed that 47% (105/225) delayed insulin treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among patients receiving insulin, 6/240 (3%) scored ≥ 3 on items “I am afraid of injecting myself” and “I’m afraid to prick my finger” using the Barriers to Diabetes Questionnaire, indicating “serious problems” with needles [ 47 ]. A study utilising face-face interviews examined the prevalence of primary non-adherence with insulin and barriers to insulin initiation in patients with type 2 diabetes [ 51 ]. This study revealed that 47% (105/225) delayed insulin treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a variety of other assessment methods were used including psychometric self-report tools [ 25 , 26 , 35 , 39 ], investigator-created surveys [ 1 , 28 , 30 , 41 , 50 , 52 ], and face-to-face interviews [ 2 , 33 , 40 ]. Moreover, needle phobia was determined by single or multiple items on self-report measures [ 2 , 24 , 28 , 51 ], not formal diagnostic assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While using a clear and universal definition of needle phobia can benefit clinical practice and research, any level of needle fear is important, considering its significant negative impacts on physical and mental well-being [ 6 , 7 , 9 13 ]. Adopting a broad definition may be more inclusive of patients experiencing needle fear in their daily lives, who may not fulfill the criteria for narrow definitions, and could still present risks of avoiding medical care [ 6 , 7 , 10 12 ]. Thus, the high prevalence reported in this study may be more representative of the burden needle phobia constitutes in the general adult population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, needle phobia may lead to poor disease prognosis due to poor adherence to treatment. [ 10 ] Because these patients are likely suffering from chronic (e.g., kidney disease) or other severe conditions (e.g., cancer), they may be more vulnerable to needle phobia and its impacts on treatment adherence. Avoidance behavior may have a more significant impact on patients with conditions requiring frequent injections compared to healthier individuals [ 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some strong arguments in favour of the benefits of orally administered insulin compared to injections. The numbers of Type II diabetic patients adhering to the SC chronic dosing regimen for insulin is low, estimated as less than 50% (Sharma et al, 2020). Many Type II diabetic patients delay by more than 2 years going onto insulin from when first offered it, while others may adhere to the dosing regimen at the beginning, but then their commitment may wane.…”
Section: The Arguments For Oral Insulin For Diabetic Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%