Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults in Central and Eastern Europe: a systematic review and synthesis without meta-analysis

Abstract

We aimed to systematically review the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older adults in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) in all care settings. We searched Embase and MEDLINE (up to June 2019) and checked the reference lists of the included studies and relevant reviews. Eligible studies used validated explicit or implicit tools to assess the PIP prevalence in older adults in CEE. All study designs were considered, except case‒control studies and case series. We assessed the risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Meta-analysis was inappropriate due to heterogeneity in the outcome measurements. Therefore, we used the synthesis without meta-analysis approach—summarizing effect estimates method. This review included twenty-seven studies with 139,693 participants. Most studies were cross-sectional and conducted in high-income countries. The data synthesis across 26 studies revealed the PIP prevalence: the median was 34.6%, the interquartile range was 25.9–63.2%, and the range was 6.5–95.8%. The certainty of this evidence was very low due to the risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. These findings show that PIP is a prevalent issue in the CEE region. Further well-designed studies conducted across countries are needed to strengthen the existing evidence and increase the generalizability of findings.

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications in Iranian elderly hospitalized patients

“…A study in teaching hospitals of Ilam City in Iran (2022) nds Pain Relievers as the more frequent PIMs in elderly patients. Sedative-Hypnotics are associated with sedation, cognitive and psychomotor impairment, and delirium which increases the risk of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients (19). In two other studies among Iranian elderly patients, Benzodiazepines (20,21), Antipsychotics (21), Pain Relievers, and antidepressants (20) were the most frequent PIMs.…”

Quality of Life, Neurosensory Disorders and Co-Occurring Medical Conditions in Individuals on the Spectrum, with a Special Focus on Females Diagnosed with Autism: A Systematic Review

“…The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Cohort Studies was used to assess the studies' quality and risk of bias [19][20][21]. This assessment was completed separately by two investigators (C.D.…”

Revisiting systematic reviews on deprescribing trials to better inform future practice and research

“…It is estimated that one-to two-thirds of older people are prescribed a medicine with more harm than benefit. 6,7 Deprescribing may improve overall adherence to essential drugs while reducing costs, inconvenience and medication-related harms. 5 There has been an increasing amount of research around deprescribing in older adults over the last 15 years.…”

“…Deprescribing is highly relevant in the context of older adults with multimorbidy, polypharmacy and low adherence to medications. It is estimated that one‐ to two‐thirds of older people are prescribed a medicine with more harm than benefit 6,7 . Deprescribing may improve overall adherence to essential drugs while reducing costs, inconvenience and medication‐related harms 5 …”