2021
DOI: 10.1097/lgt.0000000000000626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Positive Cervical Cancer Screening Tests Past the Age of 65 Years With Prior Adequate Negative Screening

Abstract: Objectives: Cervical cancer screening recommendations suggest that cessation can be offered above the age of 65 years if specific prior negative screening criteria are met. We investigated the prevalence of abnormal results in individuals who continue screening despite satisfying the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines for cessation. Materials and Methods:In this retrospective study, medical records 2008-2019 from a single urban hospital-based clinic were queried. Charts were manu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the guidelines for Australia's new National Cervical Screening Program are being periodically reviewed in light of new evidence, there will be the opportunity for these factors to be considered, so that women may be spared unnecessarily frequent investigations and treatment. We concur with Sheu et al 8 in their recommendation to prioritise the capturing of underscreened women earlier in their lives, over continued screening and investigation of older women in a low‐risk category, with the inevitable subsequent morbidity. With the advent of our findings, other countries are now also able to consider the relevance of this evidence to their own program development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the guidelines for Australia's new National Cervical Screening Program are being periodically reviewed in light of new evidence, there will be the opportunity for these factors to be considered, so that women may be spared unnecessarily frequent investigations and treatment. We concur with Sheu et al 8 in their recommendation to prioritise the capturing of underscreened women earlier in their lives, over continued screening and investigation of older women in a low‐risk category, with the inevitable subsequent morbidity. With the advent of our findings, other countries are now also able to consider the relevance of this evidence to their own program development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Details of each individual's screening history were obtained through the National Cancer Screening Register and categorised, taking into consideration regularity of participation, recency of participation and presence/absence of previous abnormalities. Screening histories were classified based on the recently endorsed criteria for screening adequacy from the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology with small modifications 8 . Category 1 contained women with adequate screening history, defined as three consecutive negative cytology results in the previous 10 years, with the most recent test within the previous 5 years and no previous abnormal cytology or cervical histology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%