2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 Gene Deletion in Plasmodium falciparum Population in Eight Highly Endemic States in India

Abstract: BackgroundPlasmodium falciparum encoded histidine rich protein (HRP2) based malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are used in India. Deletion of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 genes contributes to false negative test results, and large numbers of such deletions have been reported from South America, highlighting the importance of surveillance to detect such deletions.MethodsThis is the first prospective field study carried out at 16 sites located in eight endemic states of India to assess the performance of PfHRP2 based RD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
121
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
121
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the associated risk of overtreatment of uninfected cases is considered more acceptable in malaria endemic zones than taking the risk of failing to detect cases. Recently, there has been reports of deletion of HRP2 gene which may lead to false RDT negative results [47, 48]. However, studies conducted in Africa showed HRP2 deletion in very small numbers of parasite isolates [49, 50], hence highly unlikely that the phenomenon may have influenced the results of this survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the associated risk of overtreatment of uninfected cases is considered more acceptable in malaria endemic zones than taking the risk of failing to detect cases. Recently, there has been reports of deletion of HRP2 gene which may lead to false RDT negative results [47, 48]. However, studies conducted in Africa showed HRP2 deletion in very small numbers of parasite isolates [49, 50], hence highly unlikely that the phenomenon may have influenced the results of this survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With the large sample size of 4382 patients, sampling of all RDT negatives (vs selective sampling employed in our study), and use of quantitative PCR, the study is a useful addition to the few published studies on performance of RDT to assess symptomatic malaria in low-transmission settings [1,3,4]. As malaria transmission declines, the proportion of low-density infection among symptomatic as well as asymptomatic individuals increases [5][6][7]. It is generally assumed that symptomatic individuals will present with high-density infection; however, low-density infections accounted for 24% of all PCRpositive cases, compared to 22% in our study (taking into accounting the sampling of RDT negatives).…”
Section: Reply To Rossi Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both analyses, specificity was 99.7%, and the PPV scored 89.0% and 88.5%, respectively. Low parasitemia was the main reason for false-negative RDT 5], the deletions of pfhrp2 and/or pfhrp3 genes are currently investigated.…”
Section: Performance Of Rapid Diagnostic Testing In Patients With Susmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely used RDTs are designed to detect P. falciparum histidine-rich protein 2 and cross-react with histidine-rich protein 3, encoded by the hrp2 and hrp3 genes respectively. Parasites with gene deletions of hrp2 and/or hrp3 have emerged as an important cause of RDT failure in a number of locations [75][76][77][78][79] . It is difficult to devise a simple genetic assay to monitor for risk of RDT failure because hrp2 and hrp3 deletions comprise a diverse mixture of large structural variations with multiple independent origins, and both genes are located in subtelomeric regions of the genome with very high levels of natural variation 29,[80][81][82][83] .…”
Section: Hrp2/3 Deletions That Affect Rapid Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%