2020
DOI: 10.24275/uam/izt/dcbs/nacameh/2020v14n1/gutierrez
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of pathogenic microorganisms in pork meat offered for retail sale in supermarkets of Mexico City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a comparison, Saraiva et al [ 44 ] observed that L. monocytogenes survived better in refrigerated vacuum-packed meat compared to fresh air-packed products. Previous studies also reported a prevalence ranging from 15.9% to 33.3% for L. monocytogenes in fresh meat [ 45 , 46 ]. As for Salmonella spp., few positive samples were detected, and only at day 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As a comparison, Saraiva et al [ 44 ] observed that L. monocytogenes survived better in refrigerated vacuum-packed meat compared to fresh air-packed products. Previous studies also reported a prevalence ranging from 15.9% to 33.3% for L. monocytogenes in fresh meat [ 45 , 46 ]. As for Salmonella spp., few positive samples were detected, and only at day 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As a comparison, Saraiva et al [44] observed that L. monocytogenes survived better in refrigerated vacuum-packed meat compared to fresh airpacked products. Previous studies also reported a prevalence ranging from 15.9% to 33.3% for L. monocytogenes in fresh meat [45,46]. As for Salmonella spp., few positive samples were detected, and only at day 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%