“…This prevalence is in agreement with the results in the literature, among haemodilysis patients that range between 0 to 58% in countries such as Canada, Turkey, Italy, Spain, Iran, Brazil and Egypt [5,7,18,19] and it is also in agreement with the findings studies conducted in Khartoum State, (1), West kordofan State, Sudan [2] and in El Gazeera State, Sudan [20] in which the frequencies of OHB among haemodialysis patients was 3.3%, 17.5% and 11.5%, respectively but disagrees with studies from Sudan in which no OHB was detected among haemodialysis and blood donors patients respectively [6,15] and a study from Iran in which no OBH cases were found among haemodialysis patients. Although, the results of the present study and other studies [1,2,20,21]; highly supported the existence of OHB in hemodialysis patients, more studies are needed to fully elucidate the incidence of OHB in Sudan [22,23]. The conflicts in the reported incidences of occult HBV infection among several studies, including this study, could be attributed to several factors such as the sensitivity of the various molecular biology techniques used in detection of HBV DNA, the prevalence of HBV in geographical area, the storage of the sample, the age and sex of patients and the differences in the studies sample size [14,24,25].…”