2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Neospora caninum, Toxoplasma gondii and Brucella abortus in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): Climatic and environmental risk factors in eastern and southeast Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the line of previous results of Baltazar-Pérez, et al 31 , the sex is significant risk factor for prevalence of N. caninum in buffaloes. Contrary to findings of Campero, et al 35 and Kengradomkij, et al 27 , the results revealed strong association between N. caninum seroprevalence in water buffaloes and sex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the line of previous results of Baltazar-Pérez, et al 31 , the sex is significant risk factor for prevalence of N. caninum in buffaloes. Contrary to findings of Campero, et al 35 and Kengradomkij, et al 27 , the results revealed strong association between N. caninum seroprevalence in water buffaloes and sex.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the present study, the overall seroprevalence rate of N. caninum in water buffaloes was 31.3%, falling within the previously reported range (27.5% to 35.4%) in Brazil 24,25 . The reported seroprevalence rate for neosporosis in the current survey was higher than those reported in in Vietnam (1.05%) 26 , Thailand (9.1-16.7%) 27 , India (9.9%) 28 , Iran (19.3%) 29 and Mexico (24.3-41.2%) 30,31 . Furthermore, the prevalence of the current findings appears to be lower when compared to research done in Brazil, where rates varied from 49 to 88% [32][33][34] , Argentina (64%) 35 and Guangxi, China (50.9%) 36 .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…In any case, these assays do not outperform the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity (DSe and DSp) of the classical buffered Brucella agglutination tests (Rose Bengal [RBT], Card and Buffered Plate Agglutination tests) that do not suffer from cut-off adjustment problems [ 50 ]. There are abundant examples of these problems in the recent literature [ 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 61 , 62 , 66 , 68 , 71 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 ].…”
Section: One-health Challenges For Brucellosismentioning
confidence: 99%