2016
DOI: 10.1007/5584_2016_164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Neisseria meningitidis Carriage with Identification of Serogroups and Genogroups in Professional Soldiers

Abstract: The article presents the prevalence of Neisseria meningitidis carriage with the identification of sero- and genogroups in professional soldiers serving in the Polish Armed Forces. A total of 1246 soldiers from the 10th Armored Cavalry Brigade in Świętoszów, Poland were examined in the period January-February 2016. Microbiological tests were performed using standard methods (culture, incubation, microscopy, biochemical, and automated identification with VITEK cards). Neisseria meningitidis isolates from carrier… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies with the participation of Polish military personnel demonstrated that meningococcal carriage incidence was lower in older soldiers; the results are consistent with the available research findings (Taha 2000;Tzeng and Stephens 2000;Caugant et al 2009;Soriano-Gabarro et al 2011). Another factor associated with an increased risk for meningococcal carriage was found to be tobacco smoking (Blackwell et al 1990;Caugant et al 1992;Korzeniewski et al 2017). The studies by Caugant et al (1988) demonstrated that hypervirulent N. meningitidis strains rarely colonize the nasopharyngeal mucosa of carriers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The studies with the participation of Polish military personnel demonstrated that meningococcal carriage incidence was lower in older soldiers; the results are consistent with the available research findings (Taha 2000;Tzeng and Stephens 2000;Caugant et al 2009;Soriano-Gabarro et al 2011). Another factor associated with an increased risk for meningococcal carriage was found to be tobacco smoking (Blackwell et al 1990;Caugant et al 1992;Korzeniewski et al 2017). The studies by Caugant et al (1988) demonstrated that hypervirulent N. meningitidis strains rarely colonize the nasopharyngeal mucosa of carriers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Many of Polish and European publications on the N. meningitidis carriage incidence are limited to military environment (Chapalain et al 1992;Tyski et al 2000;Korzeniewski et al 2015). According to the research findings, meningococcal carriage is high among conscripted soldiers serving in European armies, whereas among profes-sional soldiers it was found to be like the carriage rates observed in the general population (Korzeniewski et al 2017). Meningococcal carriage studies conducted among military personnel also revealed that serogroup B was the most prevalent (Taha 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study identified a carriage prevalence of 16% for N. meningitidis in those entering a military college in the Russian Federation, and similar rates have been seen in recruits entering a military setting in Greece (15%) (Tryfinopoulou et al, 2016) and Poland (16-24%) (Tyski et al, 2001), with lower carriage rates seen for recruits entering a military setting in Turkey (4.2%) (Celal Basustaoglu et al, 2011) and Iran (8%) (Ataee et al, 2016) and professional soldiers in Poland (5.2% and 9.6%) (Korzeniewski et al, 2017;Korzeniewski et al, 2015). It was anticipated that the carriage rate would increase after recruitment while the recruits resided in a semi-closed environment as these populations are at higher risk for outbreaks of meningococcal disease (Aguilera et al, 2002;Brundage et al, 2002; National Foundation for Infectious Diseases (NFID), 2017); while a study of the change in carriage rate in students identified a rapid increase on entering university (Neal et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%