2003
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.20177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of myotonic dystrophy in Israeli Jewish communities: Inter‐community variation and founder premutations

Abstract: In a comprehensive epidemiological survey among Jews living in Israel, the average prevalence of myotonic dystrophy (DM) was 15.7/10(5) (1 case in 6369) with intercommunity variations; the Ashkenazi Jews had the lowest rate, 5.7/10(5) (1 case in 17544) as compared to the rate in the Sephardim/Oriental Jews 20/10(5) (1 case in 5000) and the in the Yemenite Jews 47.3/10(5) (1 case in 2114). The rate of unrelated DM-sibships per 10(6) people of each community was used as an estimate of the transition rate from st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 In Jewish communities, an average prevalence of 15.7 per 100 000 was reported in a study including 416 DM1 patients of which 307 were diagnosed genetically and 109 were clinically diagnosed. 14 The same study reported even higher prevalences in two Jewish subgroups: 20.0 per 100 000 in Sephardim/Oriental Jews and 47.3 per 100 000 in Yemenite Jews. Among Jews, Ashkenazi had the lowest prevalence with 5.7 per 100 000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 In Jewish communities, an average prevalence of 15.7 per 100 000 was reported in a study including 416 DM1 patients of which 307 were diagnosed genetically and 109 were clinically diagnosed. 14 The same study reported even higher prevalences in two Jewish subgroups: 20.0 per 100 000 in Sephardim/Oriental Jews and 47.3 per 100 000 in Yemenite Jews. Among Jews, Ashkenazi had the lowest prevalence with 5.7 per 100 000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…10 As the advent of molecular genetic testing for DM1, several prevalence studies have been reported, [11][12][13][14][15]17 but so far no large-scale population studies have been performed. Most of the reported studies were based on the number of diagnosed patients related to the corresponding total population in a certain region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, two major haplotypes (in addition to their derivatives) were observed in French-Canadians from Northeastern Quebec and from the Outaouais region, which were distinct from the major haplotype characteristic of Canadian DM1 patients of non-French descent. An example of the diversification of a founder effect in an isolated population is provided by Segel et al (2003), who studied the prevalence of DM1 in three Israeli-Jewish populations: the Ashkenazim, Sepharadim and Yemenites. They found that DM1 prevalence varied widely, ranging from as low as 1/17,544 in the Ashkenazim to 1/5,000 in the Sepharadim and up to 1/2,114 in the Yemenites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed ethnic difference in the prevalence of myotonic dystrophy means that for Māori, and Pasifika, myotonic dystrophy was less common than facioscapulohumeral and the dystrophinopathies, a finding not previously described. Lower prevalence of myotonic dystrophy has been found in other ethnic minority groups in South Africa [12] and Israel [13]. However, these previous studies did not compare prevalence of myotonic dystrophy to other genetic muscle disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%