2013
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Mutations in eyeGENE Probands With a Diagnosis of Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa

Abstract: The Laboratory for Molecular Diagnosis of Inherited Eye Disease at the University of Texas in Houston has thus far received DNA samples from 170 families with a diagnosis of adRP from the eyeGENE Network. Disease-causing mutations in autosomal genes were identified in 48% (81/170) of these families while mutations in X-linked genes accounted for an additional 4% (7/170). Of the 55 distinct mutations detected, 19 (33%) have not been previously reported. All diagnostic results were returned by eyeGENE to partici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have reported 144 novel disease-causing variants as a possible cause of IRD (see online supplementary table S8). Thirteen of these variants determined as novel at the time of clinical analysis have since been described as disease causing in other studies, for example, USH2A c.11713C>T p.(Arg3905Cys)34 and PRPF31 c.1060C>T p.(Arg354Ter) 35. Many of the reported novel variants are expected to cause disruption of normal translation, including 35 nonsense variants, 6 disruptions of canonical splice sites and 31 out-of-frame coding indels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have reported 144 novel disease-causing variants as a possible cause of IRD (see online supplementary table S8). Thirteen of these variants determined as novel at the time of clinical analysis have since been described as disease causing in other studies, for example, USH2A c.11713C>T p.(Arg3905Cys)34 and PRPF31 c.1060C>T p.(Arg354Ter) 35. Many of the reported novel variants are expected to cause disruption of normal translation, including 35 nonsense variants, 6 disruptions of canonical splice sites and 31 out-of-frame coding indels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…7,11,17,23 This variability has challenged the ability to identify the accurate disease inheritance mode in families with affected female patients. [24][25][26] In the early stages of genetic counseling of an RP pedigree, the presence of affected female subjects should raise suspicion of both an autosomal-dominant and an X-linked inheritance mode. In fact, typical RP fundus features, such as bonespicular or nummular intraretinal pigmentation, optic disc pallor, and vascular attenuation, were common in this cohort, expectedly more so in heterozygotes from RP pedigrees (49%, 44%, and 56%, respectively; Table) than in those from COD/ CORD pedigrees (18%, 18%, and 18%, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study of patients with recessive Stargardt disease, the causative mutation detection rate using similar methods was 44% (Briggs et al, 2001). In a study of patients with autosomal dominant RP, the disease-causing mutation was found in 52% of probands with complete sequencing of 12 genes (Sullivan et al, 2013). Mutations in known genes are estimated to contribute to IRD pathology in about 50% of dominant cases (Daiger, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%