Prevalence of Misophonia and Correlates of Its Symptoms among Inpatients with Depression

Siepsiak, Marta; Sobczak, Anna Maria; Bohaterewicz, Bartosz; Cichocki, Łukasz; Dragan, Wojciech Ł.

doi:10.3390/ijerph17155464

Cited by 43 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The total score is obtained by summing the scores for each item, it ranges from 14 to 70. A total score above (or equal to) 61 suggests misophonia diagnosis 18 . Siepsiak et al 18 chose this cut-off by subtracting one standard deviation (SD = 4.3) from the mean total score of misophonics (mean = 65.72).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A psychoacoustic test for misophonia assessment

Enzler

Loriot

Fournier

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Misophonia is a condition where a strong arousal response is triggered when hearing specific human generated sounds, like chewing, and/or repetitive tapping noises, like pen clicking. It is diagnosed with clinical interviews and questionnaires since no psychoacoustic tools exist to assess its presence. The present study was aimed at developing and testing a new assessment tool for misophonia. The method was inspired by an approach we have recently developed for hyperacusis. It consisted of presenting subjects (n = 253) with misophonic, pleasant, and unpleasant sounds in an online experiment. The task was to rate them on a pleasant to unpleasant visual analog scale. Subjects were labeled as misophonics (n = 78) or controls (n = 55) by using self-report questions and a misophonia questionnaire, the MisoQuest. There was a significant difference between controls and misophonics in the median global rating of misophonic sounds. On the other hand, median global rating of unpleasant, and pleasant sounds did not differ significantly. We selected a subset of the misophonic sounds to form the core discriminant sounds of misophonia (CDSMiso). A metric: the CDS score, was used to quantitatively measure misophonia, both with a global score and with subscores. The latter could specifically quantify aversion towards different sound sources/events, i.e., mouth, breathing/nose, throat, and repetitive sounds. A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the method accurately classified subjects with and without misophonia (accuracy = 91%). The present study suggests that the psychoacoustic test we have developed can be used to assess misophonia reliably and quickly.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A psychoacoustic test for misophonia assessment

Enzler

Loriot

Fournier

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An interesting finding was that avoidant coping and PPD were not related. The relationship between avoidance and depressive symptoms has been extensively analyzed in both clinical [ 63 , 64 ] and non-clinical samples [ 26 ]. Its study in the context of PPD has been less frequent, but studies appear to indicate modest, yet significant associations between avoidant coping in the mothers and PPD [ 65 , 66 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is the Association between Postpartum Depression and Early Maternal–Infant Relationships Contextually Determined by Avoidant Coping in the Mother?

Peñacoba

Suso‐Ribera

Rico

et al. 2021

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyzes the moderating role of avoidant coping (in early pregnancy) in the relationship between postpartum depressive (PPD) symptoms and maternal perceptions about mother–baby relations and self-confidence. Participants were 116 low-risk obstetric mothers (mean age = 31.2 years, SD = 3.95, range 23–42) who received care and gave birth at a Spanish public hospital. Measurements were made at two points in time: at first trimester of pregnancy (maternal avoidance coping) and four months after childbirth (PPD and maternal perceptions). Avoidant coping was associated with the perception of the baby as irritable and unstable (p = 0.003), including irritability during lactation (p = 0.041). Interaction effects of avoidant coping and postpartum depression were observed on the perception of the baby as irritable (p = 0.031) and with easy temperament (p = 0.002). Regarding the mother’s self-confidence, avoidant coping was related to a lack of security in caring for the baby (p < 0.001) and had a moderating effect between PPD and mother’s self-confidence (i.e., lack of security in caring for the baby, p =0.027; general security, p = 0.007). Interaction effects showed that the use of avoidant coping in the mother exacerbated the impact of PPD on the early mother–infant relationship.

show abstract

“…A total score above (or equal to) 61 suggests misophonia diagnosis 13 . Siepsiak et al 13 chose this cut-off by subtracting one standard deviation (SD = 4.3) from the mean total score of misophonics (mean = 65.72). To verify this cut-off, we performed a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) 14 analysis of data from Siepsiak et al 11 (Supplementary Data "raw_data2.csv") and found that a cut-off of 61 was optimal in separating MisoQuest total scores of controls (n=254) from scores of misophonics (n=61).…”

Section: Online Taskmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The total score is obtained by summing the scores for each item, it ranges from 14 to 70. A total score above (or equal to) 61 suggests misophonia diagnosis 13 . Siepsiak et al 13 chose this cut-off by subtracting one standard deviation (SD = 4.3) from the mean total score of misophonics (mean = 65.72).…”

Section: Online Taskmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Psychoacoustic Test for Misophonia Assessment

Enzler

Loriot

Fournier

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Misophonia is a condition where a strong arousal response is triggered when hearing specific human generated sounds, like chewing, and/or repetitive tapping noises, like pen clicking. It is diagnosed with clinical interviews and questionnaires since no psychoacoustic tools exist to assess its presence. The present study was aimed at developing and testing a new assessment tool for misophonia. The method was inspired by an approach we have recently developed for hyperacusis. It consisted of presenting subjects (n=253) with misophonic, pleasant, and unpleasant sounds in an online experiment. The task was to rate them on a pleasant to unpleasant visual analog scale. Subjects were labeled as misophonics (n=78) or controls (n=55) by using self-report questions and a misophonia questionnaire, the MisoQuest. There was a significant difference between controls and misophonics in the median global rating of misophonic sounds. On the other hand, median global rating of unpleasant, and pleasant sounds did not differ significantly. We selected a subset of the misophonic sounds to form the core discriminant sounds of misophonia (CDSMiso). A metric: the CDS score, was used to quantitatively measure misophonia, both with a global score and with subscores. The latter could specifically quantify aversion towards different sound sources/events, i.e., mouth, breathing/nose, throat, and repetitive sounds. A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the method accurately classified subjects with and without misophonia (accuracy = 91 %). The present study suggests that the psychoacoustic test we have developed can be used to assess misophonia reliably and quickly.

show abstract

Prevalence of Misophonia and Correlates of Its Symptoms among Inpatients with Depression

Cited by 43 publications

References 39 publications

A psychoacoustic test for misophonia assessment

A psychoacoustic test for misophonia assessment

Is the Association between Postpartum Depression and Early Maternal–Infant Relationships Contextually Determined by Avoidant Coping in the Mother?

A Psychoacoustic Test for Misophonia Assessment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About