2019
DOI: 10.29252/jrdms.4.1.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Mid-Mesial Canal and Isthmuses in Mandibular First and Second Molars in an Iranian Population

Abstract: 1. Dental student , sari faculty of dentistry, mazandaran university of medical science , ,sari, iran 2. Dentist ,sari ,iran 3.Dental student, sari dental faculty ,mazandaran university of medical sciences, sari, iran 4.Associate professor, department of radiology ,babol dental faculty, babol university of medical sciences , babol , iran 5.Assistant professor, department of endodontics, sari dental faculty , mazandaran university of medical sciences, sari ,iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the possible limitations of CBCT, the overall prevalence of mesial root isthmuses, which occurred predominantly in two‐rooted teeth (61%), compares well with the 42%–76% prevalence in second molars reported in previous CBCT studies assessing simple presence or absence 28,29 . A similar prevalence of 30%–55% has also been reported in ex vivo diaphanization studies, 2,30 and of up to 84% with micro‐CT 31 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Despite the possible limitations of CBCT, the overall prevalence of mesial root isthmuses, which occurred predominantly in two‐rooted teeth (61%), compares well with the 42%–76% prevalence in second molars reported in previous CBCT studies assessing simple presence or absence 28,29 . A similar prevalence of 30%–55% has also been reported in ex vivo diaphanization studies, 2,30 and of up to 84% with micro‐CT 31 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Two studies were excluded because the studies did not include the MMC in mesial root configuration ( Pawar et al, 2017 , Zhang et al, 2015 ), four studies were excluded because they did not state the voxel size and the CBCT machine ( Al Shehadat et al, 2019 , Babu and Anjaneyulu, 2020 , Perlea et al, 2019 , Reddy et al, 2021 ), and one study was excluded because the voxel size used in the study was more than 400 µm ( Tredoux et al, 2021 ). Finally, 28 studies were included in the meta-analysis ( Abarca et al, 2020 , Akbarzadeh et al, 2017 , Aldosimani et al, 2021 , Arayasantiparb et al, 2017 , Bhatti et al, 2022 , Demirbuga et al, 2013 , Hasheminia et al, 2021 , Hosseini et al, 2020 , Hu et al, 2019 , Inaty et al, 2020 , Kantilieraki, 2019 , Kuzekanani et al, 2020 , Ni et al, 2018 , Nur et al, 2014 , Palottil et al, 2021 , Pan et al, 2019 , Qiao et al, 2020 , Rehman et al, 2020 , Roshdy and El Khodary, 2018 , Sajjan et al, 2021 , Senthil and Solete, 2021 , Shah and Khan, 2019 , Shakeri et al, 2019 , Srivastava et al, 2018 , Tahmasbi et al, 2017 , Torres et al, 2015 , Xu et al, 2020 , Yang et al, 2020 ). The main features of the included studies are summarized in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%