2009
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Malocclusion in Jaipur, India

Abstract: A study was undertaken to determine the prevalence of malocclusion in Jaipur city, India. A total of 700 subjects, in the age group of 16-26 years were divided into five groups of normal occlusion, Angle’s Class I, Class II Div 1, Class II Div 2 and Class III malocclusion. The results revealed that the prevalence of malocclusion was 66.3%, with the majority of them having Class I malocclusion (57.9%), while the prevalence of Class III malocclusion was found to be the least (1.4%). There was no statistically si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(2 reference statements)
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of class I malocclusion seen in the present study (69.8%) is almost similar to the findings by Trehan et al 11 in Jaipur (57.9%) and Das and Reddy 12 in Bengaluru (61.6%), India. This is found to be higher according to studies of Phaphe et al 13 in Bagalkot (17.8%) and Vibhute et al 14 in Mumbai (49.1%), India and lower when compared to the findings of Mtaya et al 5 in Tanzania (93.6%) and Ajayi 7 in Nigeria (80.7%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prevalence of class I malocclusion seen in the present study (69.8%) is almost similar to the findings by Trehan et al 11 in Jaipur (57.9%) and Das and Reddy 12 in Bengaluru (61.6%), India. This is found to be higher according to studies of Phaphe et al 13 in Bagalkot (17.8%) and Vibhute et al 14 in Mumbai (49.1%), India and lower when compared to the findings of Mtaya et al 5 in Tanzania (93.6%) and Ajayi 7 in Nigeria (80.7%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…When compared with our study, a higher prevalence of malocclusion was reported by Abu Alhaija et al 8 in Jordan (92%) and Rwakatema 9 in Tanzania (97.6%). But the studies conducted by Hemapriya et al 10 in Kancheepuram (75%) and Trehan et al 11 in Jaipur (66.7%) reported a lower prevalence than the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The prevalence of malocclusion was 66.7% in a study done in Jaipur out of which 57.9% had Angle's class I malocclusion. Lower incidence of Angle's class II division 2 (1.9%) and Angle's class III malocclusion (1.4%) was observed [6]. In a similar study, prevalence of malocclusion was 36.42% out of which 29.74% had mild to moderate malocclusion and 6.68% had a more severe malocclusion.…”
Section: Rajasthanmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The study sample was divided into five groups according to the type of Angle class I malocclusion which is type 1 (anterior crowding), type 2 (protrusive maxillary incisors), type 3 (anterior crossbite), type 4 (posterior crossbite) and type 5 (mesialization of permanent molars). 22 The TMJ position was measured in relation of two reference lines. The 'X' axis was referred to vertical T line and 'Y' axis was formed by TC line.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%