2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2016.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of low muscle mass according to body mass index in older adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One longitudinal study from our group has shown that underweight is a risk factor for incident albuminuria in males [27]. Although this study did not measure body composition, low muscle mass might have mediated the association between underweight and albuminuria [28]. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first large-scale longitudinal study to have shown that low skeletal muscle mass predicts the future development of albuminuria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…One longitudinal study from our group has shown that underweight is a risk factor for incident albuminuria in males [27]. Although this study did not measure body composition, low muscle mass might have mediated the association between underweight and albuminuria [28]. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first large-scale longitudinal study to have shown that low skeletal muscle mass predicts the future development of albuminuria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Additionally, an accurate reporting of the prevalence of sarcopenia continues to be challenging due to differences in the methods used to assess muscle mass and in cutoff values used for diagnosis, and due to variability among study populations such as those who are generally healthy, frail, or have comorbidities. [13] Data from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III, which included a large sample of over 4,500 adults aged 60 years and older from multiple ethnicities, found that 59% of women and 45% of men had sarcopenia. [14] These prevalence figures are based on the skeletal muscle mass index which is calculated as skeletal muscle mass (attained using bioelectrical impedance analysis) divided by body mass times 100, and then compared with gender-specific values from younger adults (aged 18 to 39 years) in an approach similar to that used to diagnose osteoporosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of these differences, prevalence reports for sarcopenia range from about 1 to 85% in the scientific literature. [13,15,16] Yet, while the exact prevalence of sarcopenia among older adults in the United States is not clear, the condition is costly to treat. In the United States, in 2000, the estimated direct health care cost attributable to sarcopenia was 18.5 billion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considered together, the emerging literature on patients with COVID-19 indirectly highlights the relevance of nutrition in possibly determining their outcomes. Older age and the presence of comorbid conditions are almost invariably associated with impaired nutritional status and sarcopenia, independently of body mass index [6]. Interestingly, a high body mass index score appears to be related to a poor prognosis in comorbid patients with COVID-19, which further points to a possible role of sarcopenic obesity in influencing outcome [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%