2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2014.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of irregular red blood cell antibodies among healthy blood donors in Delhi population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence noted in the present study is 0.09%, which is comparable with the similar two studies conducted from the same region. [ 7 8 ] Pahuja et al . [ 7 ] showed the prevalence of 0.05% among 7756 whole blood donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prevalence noted in the present study is 0.09%, which is comparable with the similar two studies conducted from the same region. [ 7 8 ] Pahuja et al . [ 7 ] showed the prevalence of 0.05% among 7756 whole blood donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garg et al . [ 8 ] reported a prevalence of 0.09% among 47,450 whole blood donors. On the contrary, Giblett[ 9 ] had reported 0.32% incidence of irregular RBC antibodies in blood donors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Así, en Singapur el uso de células Di a permitió determinar la presencia de aloinmunización por el sistema Diego en 19 de 1,383 muestras con resultados indeterminados en el panel de células comerciales 15 . Diversos estudios han determinado la presencia de aloanticuerpos anti-Di a en donantes de sangre, desde el 0.02% hasta el 13.0% 16 . En esta investigación se detectó una prevalencia del 6% de anti-Di a en donantes de sangre, mientras que en Texas en el área de Corpus Christi se reportó una prevalencia del 1.3% de aloanticuerpo anti-Di a en individuos con transfusiones previas 17 , en Brasil se identificaron 112 (3.6%) pacientes con anti-Di a , en Singapur se determinó una frecuencia del 1.37% 2,15 y en el estudio realizado en Guatemala se encontró una prevalencia del 3.5% de anti-Di a en pacientes multitransfundidos 10 .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…However other studies had higher prevalence 0.09-0.13 % [3,4]. These differences in prevalence may be due to variation in the study population and techniques used for detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%