2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12914-019-0215-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of intimate partner violence against women in the Arab world: a systematic review

Abstract: BackgroundViolence against women has particular importance for women’s health and wellbeing in the Arab world, where women face persistent barriers to social, political and economic equality. This review aims to summarize what is known about the prevalence of physical, sexual and emotional/psychological intimate partner violence (IPV) against women in the 22 countries of the Arab League, including geographic coverage, quality and comparability of the evidence.MethodsA systematic review of IPV prevalence in Ara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
56
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
56
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, our data extraction method for the quality assessment was not formally validated, but we adopted an approach similar to that used elsewhere [32,35,45] considering key variables in detail. Similarly, while there were no previously validated risk of bias measures for this specific type of prevalence study, we used a method with high interrater agreement that has been used elsewhere [45], including in prevalence studies of abuse and interpersonal violence [105][106]. Our approach to risk of bias adopted a conservative approach, and reasonably concluded that studies scoring 9.5 or 10 had minimal bias.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, our data extraction method for the quality assessment was not formally validated, but we adopted an approach similar to that used elsewhere [32,35,45] considering key variables in detail. Similarly, while there were no previously validated risk of bias measures for this specific type of prevalence study, we used a method with high interrater agreement that has been used elsewhere [45], including in prevalence studies of abuse and interpersonal violence [105][106]. Our approach to risk of bias adopted a conservative approach, and reasonably concluded that studies scoring 9.5 or 10 had minimal bias.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intimate-partner violence, as a form of GBV, is highest in the Eastern Mediterranean region (37.0%) and South-East Asia (37.7%). A recent study, collecting data from 22 countries of the Arab league, reveals prevalence ranging from 6% to 59% for physical abuse, from 3% to 40% for sexual abuse and from 5% to 91% for emotional/psychological intimate-partner violence (Elghossain, 2019). Another recent publication highlights similar results in 27 sub-Saharan Africa countries (Izugbara, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Intimate-partner violence, as a form of GBV, is highest in the Eastern Mediterranean region (37.0%) and South-East Asia (37.7%). A recent study, collecting data from 22 countries of the Arab league, reveals prevalence ranging from 6 to 59% for physical abuse, from 3 to 40% for sexual abuse and from 5 to 91% for emotional/psychological intimate-partner violence [ 12 ]. Another recent publication highlights similar results in 27 sub-Saharan Africa countries [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%