2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4119-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of intimate partner violence and abuse and associated factors among women enrolled into a cluster randomised trial in northwestern Tanzania

Abstract: BackgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is recognised as an important public health and social problem, with far reaching consequences for women’s physical and emotional health and social well-being. Furthermore, controlling behaviour by a partner has a similar impact on women’s well-being, yet little is known about the prevalence of this type of behaviour and other related abuses in Tanzania and in other sub-Saharan African countries.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study to determine the lifetime and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
93
7
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
20
93
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common forms of physical IPV against mothers in this study were slapping (32%) and pushing (28%). This is in line with another study in SSA where women reported being slapped (23%) and punched (11.2%) by their partners [52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The most common forms of physical IPV against mothers in this study were slapping (32%) and pushing (28%). This is in line with another study in SSA where women reported being slapped (23%) and punched (11.2%) by their partners [52].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The prevalence of at least one form of Psychological violence during their life time was (56.3%) (95% CI=52.6, 60.2).This study nding was in line with a study conducted at rural Vietnam (55.4%) [17] and eastern India (52%) [18]. This nding was higher as compared to a study conducted Ghana, eastern Sudan, Tanzania, and Romania (30%, 30.1%, 39%, and 45.1%) respectively [19][20][21][22]. This could partly be due to socio-demographic difference, former studies included government employee.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Details of the study background, design and methods, and baseline characteri stics of participants are described in detail elsewhere. 16,17 BRAC provides microfinance loans to women of low socioeconomic status with no access to formal financial services. Women are organised in groups and meet every week to repay part of their loan.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%