2017
DOI: 10.12980/apjtd.7.2017d7-142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of intestinal protozoan infections among schoolchildren in Bang Khla District, Chachoengsao Province, Central Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings from our study demonstrated that the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infection (14.3%) was significantly higher than protozoan infection (1.8%) among the adult age groups and contradicts previous findings concerning pre-SAC and SAC which have shown a low prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections in the same province [ 5 , 6 ]. In addition, our results also contrasted with previous studies among gardeners living and working in Chanthaburi Province [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Findings from our study demonstrated that the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infection (14.3%) was significantly higher than protozoan infection (1.8%) among the adult age groups and contradicts previous findings concerning pre-SAC and SAC which have shown a low prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections in the same province [ 5 , 6 ]. In addition, our results also contrasted with previous studies among gardeners living and working in Chanthaburi Province [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of the prevalence of intestinal parasites among pre-SAC and SAC showed a low incidence of soil-transmitted helminth infections in Chachoengsao Province [ 5 , 6 ]. However, no information was available regarding the prevalence and risk factors of intestinal parasitic infections among the residents of Bang Khla district, Chachoengsao Province.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of significant different in age group observed in this study agreed with reports of study by Gyang et al (2017), Mu'azu et al (2017 in Kano, Muhammad et al(2018) in Sokoto, Bala et al (2019) in Sokoto and Bishop et al (2022) in Zaria who independently discovered no relationship between age and hookworm infection and claimed that all age groups were equally vulnerable to infection. Lack of significant different in age group was not in accordance with the study conducted in Ethopia by Suntaravitun and Dokmaikaw (2017) who found that the age group of 9 years had the significantly highest overall infection rate. Additionally, it was in contrast to a study done in Morocco that revealed that children over the age of 10 had the highest frequency of infection rates (Messaad et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Lack of significant different in age group observed in this study agreed with reports of study by Gyang et al (2017) [19] , Mu'azu et al (2017) [41] in Kano, Muhammad et al (2018) [27] in Sokoto, Bala et al (2019) [10] in Sokoto and Bishop et al (2022) [13] in Zaria who independently discovered no relationship between age and hookworm infection and claimed that all age groups were equally vulnerable to infection. Lack of significant different in age group was not in accordance with the study conducted in Ethopia by Suntaravitun and Dokmaikaw (2017) [34] who found that the age group of 9 years had the significantly highest overall infection rate. Additionally, it was in contrast to a study done in Morocco that revealed that children over the age of 10 had the highest frequency of infection rates (Messaad et al, 2014) [26] .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%