2006
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1374.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Rickettsia slovaca in Dermacentor marginatus Ticks Removed from Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in Northeastern Spain

Abstract: Rickettsia slovaca, the causative agent of TIBOLA, is transmitted by Dermacentor ticks. Dermacentor marginatus is the most widely species distributed in northeastern Spain, and the wild boar constitutes the main host. D. marginatus ticks were collected from hunter-killed wild boar and were tested by PCR/RFLP. Rickettsial DNA-positive ticks were sequenced using the ompA PCR primers. The prevalence of R. slovaca in D. marginatus ticks was 17.7%. Other spotted fever group rickettsiae were detected in ticks, but t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…raoultii in D. marginatus collected from wild boars in southern Italy suggests this animal species has a potential role in the maintenance of this tick species. Indeed, the finding of D. marginatus as the most prevalent tick species detected (i.e., 99.4%) in the examined wild boar population, has already been previously reported in several areas of the Mediterranean basin (northeastern Spain, Ortuño et al, 2006;central Italy, Di Domenico et al, 2016;southern Corsica, Grech-Angelini et al, 2016). Although I. ricinus is one of the most abundant tick in Europe and vector of many pathogens, including those of zoonotic concern (Petney et al, 2012;Mendoza-Roldan et al, 2019), D. marginatus was frequently identified and screened as positive to Rickettsia monacensis ,R. slovaca and R. raoultii collected from human patients in Italy (Otranto et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…raoultii in D. marginatus collected from wild boars in southern Italy suggests this animal species has a potential role in the maintenance of this tick species. Indeed, the finding of D. marginatus as the most prevalent tick species detected (i.e., 99.4%) in the examined wild boar population, has already been previously reported in several areas of the Mediterranean basin (northeastern Spain, Ortuño et al, 2006;central Italy, Di Domenico et al, 2016;southern Corsica, Grech-Angelini et al, 2016). Although I. ricinus is one of the most abundant tick in Europe and vector of many pathogens, including those of zoonotic concern (Petney et al, 2012;Mendoza-Roldan et al, 2019), D. marginatus was frequently identified and screened as positive to Rickettsia monacensis ,R. slovaca and R. raoultii collected from human patients in Italy (Otranto et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…raoultii was detected in 1.8% of the sampled ticks; this is a Þrst report in Italy and extends its known geographic distribution in Europe. This species was previously detected in D. marginatus removed from wild boars in northeastern Spain (Ortuñ o et al 2006(Ortuñ o et al , 2007 and in D. marginatus and D. reticulatus ticks collected from vegetation, domestic animals and deer (Shpynov et al 2001(Shpynov et al , 2004Dautel et al 2006;Stanczak 2006;Nijhof et al 2007, Vitorino et al 2007Sarih et al 2008). R. raoultii was recently described as a new species; in fact, its isolates were identiÞed with different names (DnS14, DnS28, and RpA4) from Dermacentor spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We assume that the epidermis in this part of the wild boar’s body is too hard and the fur too thick to provide places favourable for tick attachment. Moreover, wild boars have been reported to be mainly hosts of Dermacentor marginatus [101], a species that has not been recorded in the study area [98], whereas D. reticulatus could be found only sporadically [67, personal observations].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%