2018
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in different population groups: systematic review andmeta-analysis

Abstract: BackgroundMycoplasma genitalium is a common cause of non-gonococcal non-chlamydial urethritis and cervicitis. Testing of asymptomatic populations has been proposed, but prevalence in asymptomatic populations is not well established. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of M. genitalium in the general population, pregnant women, men who have sex with men (MSM), commercial sex workers (CSWs) and clinic-based samples.MethodsWe searched Embase, Medline, IndMED, African Index Medicus and LILACS from 1 January 1991 t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
145
5
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
8
145
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We set the natural clearance rate γ to 0.8 y -1 , a published estimate based on epidemiological data and mathematical modelling [30], and the infection rate ,β, to 0.816 person -1 y -1 . These values result in an equilibrium prevalence of M. genitalium infections of about 2% in the absence of any treatment, which is consistent with estimates of the prevalence of M. genitalium in the sexually active population in high-income countries [31,32]. The values for the natural clearance rate and the prevalence of infection do not govern the relative growth rate of the drug-resistant proportion (Equation 6), so they do not influence the relative prevalence of resistant infections or estimates of the treatment rate in our model.…”
Section: Model Parameterssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We set the natural clearance rate γ to 0.8 y -1 , a published estimate based on epidemiological data and mathematical modelling [30], and the infection rate ,β, to 0.816 person -1 y -1 . These values result in an equilibrium prevalence of M. genitalium infections of about 2% in the absence of any treatment, which is consistent with estimates of the prevalence of M. genitalium in the sexually active population in high-income countries [31,32]. The values for the natural clearance rate and the prevalence of infection do not govern the relative growth rate of the drug-resistant proportion (Equation 6), so they do not influence the relative prevalence of resistant infections or estimates of the treatment rate in our model.…”
Section: Model Parameterssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The global estimate for the prevalence of M. genitalium is 1.7% in under 25-year-old women [29], that is slightly lower than the global prevalence of 3.8% for C. trachomatis in 15-49-year-old-women [2]. In our study, M. genitalium DNA was detected in 3.2% of the specimens, approximately as often as C. trachomatis [16].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Data on population prevalence are sparse, but a meta-analysis of six studies suggested that the prevalence of M genitalium infection ranged from 1.3% to 3.9% and was higher in countries with a low development index 11. In Britain, a probability sample survey estimated a prevalence of around 1.3% in the sexually active British population aged 16-44 years 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Britain, a probability sample survey estimated a prevalence of around 1.3% in the sexually active British population aged 16-44 years 4. In common with many other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), M genitalium infection rates can be considerably higher in men who have sex with men, sex workers, and people attending STI clinics,11 but those infected tend to be older than people with other STIs such as chlamydia; 91% of infected men and 67% of infected women are aged 25 to 44 4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%