2020
DOI: 10.5546/aap.2020.eng.e1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of hearing loss in a population of schoolchildren with Down syndrome from Bogotá, Colombia

Abstract: Introduction: Children with Down syndrome have a higher prevalence of hearing disorders, secondary to anatomical and physiological variations. No universal hearing screening is implemented in Colombia, so there are no data available on the prevalence of hearing loss in this population. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and type of such disorders in this population based on hearing tests. Patients and methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted at two institutions specialized in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radioimmunoassay (RIA), chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), colloidal gold immunochromatography (GICA), time-resolved uorescence immunoassay (TRFIA) and other detection methods have a longer detection time, more complex operation, increased sample demand, and higher cost [16][17][18], which limits the application and development to a certain extent. As a result, due to many economic, educational and cultural level reasons, many pregnant women do not participate in the pregnancy screening on time, so the birth rate of DS is still high [2,19,20]. After birth, children with DS will face the risk of repeated lung infection, heart failure, severe malnutrition and even death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radioimmunoassay (RIA), chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), colloidal gold immunochromatography (GICA), time-resolved uorescence immunoassay (TRFIA) and other detection methods have a longer detection time, more complex operation, increased sample demand, and higher cost [16][17][18], which limits the application and development to a certain extent. As a result, due to many economic, educational and cultural level reasons, many pregnant women do not participate in the pregnancy screening on time, so the birth rate of DS is still high [2,19,20]. After birth, children with DS will face the risk of repeated lung infection, heart failure, severe malnutrition and even death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%