Prevalence of harm in mindfulness-based stress reduction

Abstract

Background Mindfulness meditation has become a common method for reducing stress, stress-related psychopathology and some physical symptoms. As mindfulness programs become ubiquitous, concerns have been raised about their unknown potential for harm. We estimate multiple indices of harm following Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) on two primary outcomes: global psychological and physical symptoms. In secondary analyses, we estimate multiple indices of harm on anxiety and depressive symptoms, discomfort in interpersonal relations, paranoid ideation and psychoticism. Methods Intent-to-treat analyses with multiple imputations for missing data were used on pre- and post-test data from a large, observational dataset (n = 2155) of community health clinic MBSR classes and from MBSR (n = 156) and waitlist control (n = 118) participants from three randomized controlled trials conducted contemporaneous to community classes in the same city by the same health clinic MBSR teachers. We estimate the change in symptoms, proportion of participants with increased symptoms, proportion of participants reporting greater than a 35% increase in symptoms, and for global psychological symptoms, clinically significant harm. Results We find no evidence that MBSR leads to higher rates of harm relative to waitlist control on any primary or secondary outcome. On many indices of harm across multiple outcomes, community MBSR was significantly preventative of harm. Conclusions Engagement in MBSR is not predictive of increased rates of harm relative to no treatment. Rather, MBSR may be protective against multiple indices of harm. Research characterizing the relatively small proportion of MBSR participants that experience harm remains important.

Testing the Efficacy of a Multicomponent, Self-Guided, Smartphone-Based Meditation App: Three-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial

“…On the basis of those completing posttreatment measures, HMP appears safe in that the rates of clinically significant increases in distress were rare (3%) and were less common than the rates in the control condition (16%). This finding is consistent with a recent large-scale evaluation of the deterioration in MBSR [ 87 ].…”

Adverse events in meditation practices and meditation‐based therapies: a systematic review

“…Despite a growing interest in this area, there has been no systematic review addressing potential AEs across the whole range of meditation reports. Two recent reviews have only included the literature on mindfulness-based interventions and found that these meditation interventions were no more likely to lead to harm than a wait-list control, or they identified an overall very low rate of adverse events (1% across 36 randomized controlled trials) (25,26). By contrast, the present study aims to review the wide literature on MAEs by including all types of empirical reports, regardless of their methodological approach.…”

Online Mindfulness May Target Psychological Distress and Mental Health during COVID-19

“…Study side effects were not assessed, though harm is infrequent with guided mindfulness interventions. 29 The themes that emerged for ways of helping others may be specific to those practicing mindfulness (e.g., sharing mindfulness with others) and the recruitment strategies utilized (e.g., spiritual communities). Though participants reported helping behaviors during COVID-19, mindfulness’ effects on the desire to help others were not assessed.…”