2020
DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1828631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of extended high-frequency hearing loss among adolescents from two rural areas in Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the sampled population with clinically normal audiograms, 7% of children had EHF hearing impairment and the EHF loss count increased with age. Compared with the present study, a higher percentage of prevalence of EHF loss has been reported for 13- to 19-year olds (10%) (Peñaranda et al 2020) and for 6- to 14-year olds with suspected listening disorders (32%) (Hunter et al 2021). Although 5 out of 38 (13%) EHF-impaired children had a history of OM, unlike previous studies (Gravel et al 2006; Margolis et al 2000; Hunter et al 1996), we did not find a significant effect of the history of OM on EHF hearing (PTA EHF ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Among the sampled population with clinically normal audiograms, 7% of children had EHF hearing impairment and the EHF loss count increased with age. Compared with the present study, a higher percentage of prevalence of EHF loss has been reported for 13- to 19-year olds (10%) (Peñaranda et al 2020) and for 6- to 14-year olds with suspected listening disorders (32%) (Hunter et al 2021). Although 5 out of 38 (13%) EHF-impaired children had a history of OM, unlike previous studies (Gravel et al 2006; Margolis et al 2000; Hunter et al 1996), we did not find a significant effect of the history of OM on EHF hearing (PTA EHF ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Confounding moderate noise and ototoxic exposure could affect hearing performance additionally and independently from aging and ARHL effects. Third, we did not assess extensive high‐frequency hearing loss (above 8 kHz) which seems to be a sign of early ARHL and can be associated with “hidden hearing loss,” that means impaired speech understanding in noise despite regular PTA‐thresholds (Barbee et al, 2018; Peñaranda et al, 2021; Sun et al, 2021). Possibly some of our healthy controls already exhibit some degree of extensive high‐frequency hearing loss not consistent with totally normal hearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Special care was taken with each of the young participants as they could potentially become bored, and they were given breaks if necessary. Patients who recorded thresholds above 15 dB HL in the conventional pure-tone audiogram were considered to have hearing loss ( 18 , 19 ). Based on previous studies, we also performed statistical evaluations using a threshold value of 15 dB HL for EHFs ( 18 , 19 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that achieving a normal pure-tone hearing threshold on an audiogram does not mean that there is no pathology in the cochlea or the central auditory nervous system ( 17 ). Therefore, conventional pure-tone audiometry should be complemented by extended high-frequency (EHF) (>8 kHz) audiometry ( 17 , 18 , 19 ) to achieve an accurate diagnosis for people with a normal conventional audiogram who have listening difficulties or people with history of noise exposure and/or disorders that affect basal regions of the cochlea, such as T1D. This type of audiometry may be useful in the early diagnosis of hearing loss in certain situations, such as the ototoxic effect of cisplatin-based treatment, noise exposure, or oral misunderstanding, especially in noisy environments ( 20 ) and with T1D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation