2016
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2016/21260.8544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of ESBL in Escherichia coli Isolates Among ICU Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital

Abstract: This study has highlighted the high prevalence of ESBL producing in the ICUs of our hospital. An in depth analysis of their antibiogram will be helpful in formulating the antibiotic policy and prevent spread of ESBL strains. It is recommended that ESBL testing should be done routinely to curtail antibiotic resistance and to effectively implement infection control measures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
13
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in correlation with other studies such as Mahesh et al, (2010) and Chaudhary et al, (2013) who reported 56.2% and 54.5% ESBL production in E. coli isolates respectively. However our findings are in contrast with other studies conducted by Datta et al, (2014) Dugal et al, (2013 DMBT Dissanayake et al, (2012) and Singh et al, (2016) who reported 21.4%, 24.4%, 29% and 82.6% ESBL producing E. coli isolates respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This is in correlation with other studies such as Mahesh et al, (2010) and Chaudhary et al, (2013) who reported 56.2% and 54.5% ESBL production in E. coli isolates respectively. However our findings are in contrast with other studies conducted by Datta et al, (2014) Dugal et al, (2013 DMBT Dissanayake et al, (2012) and Singh et al, (2016) who reported 21.4%, 24.4%, 29% and 82.6% ESBL producing E. coli isolates respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Out of 291, E. coli isolates, 108 (37.11%) are ESBL-producer and 183 (62.89%) are non-ESBL-producer. Other studies reported a prevalence of ESBL-producer E. coli isolates 46.87% (10), 82.6% (11) and 21.4% (12) respectively. This different results may be due to the difference in the risk factors include recent antibiotic therapy, administration of corticosteroids, hospitalization (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2 Risk factors for infection with ESBL producing organisms are prolonged antibiotic usage, ICU stay, recent invasive procedure, pressure sores, anaemia and permanent urinary catheter. 4 The prevalence of these organisms varies geographically and in hospital settings. ESBLs have been reported worldwide in many different genera of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa 5 .…”
Section: Issn: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 9 (2017) Pp 2620-2628mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 ESBL producing isolates remain undetected as they are difficult to detect by routine susceptibility testing methods and may show false susceptibility to antibiotics by KirbyBauer disc diffusion methods. 4 Several methods have been developed to detect the presence of ESBL including Double disc synergy test (DDST) and doubledisc diffusion test (DDDT) using cefotaxime and ceftazidime, disc with or without clavulanic acid. 9 Although various studies have been conducted on the ESBL-producing strains of Enterobacteriaceae in different regions of India like Bhopal, 2 Dibrugarh, 10 Bangalore, 11 Pondicherry, 12 Bijapur, 13 Hyderabad, 14 Mumbai, 15 no published data are available on the prevalence of ESBL production in the Moradabad region of Uttar Pradesh in Northern India.…”
Section: Issn: 2319-7706 Volume 6 Number 9 (2017) Pp 2620-2628mentioning
confidence: 99%