2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2003.tb03411.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Drug‐Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Therapy‐Naive Patients and Usefulness of Genotype Testing

Abstract: In the present study, we performed genotypic drug‐resistance testing in 116 therapy‐naive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV‐1)‐infected patients between 1999 and 2002 at Nagoya National Hospital, Japan. The prevalence of drug‐resistant HIV‐1 with one or more major mutations significantly increased from 5.3% (4/75) in 1999–2001 to 17.1% (7/41) in 2002 (P=0.05), suggesting the spread of drug‐resistant HIV‐1. We identified a patient who possessed a protease (PR) inhibitor‐resistant HIV‐1 with a major mutat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such variants cannot form major populations in viral quasi-species when acquired mutations cause severe damage to replicative fitness. Drug-resistant HIV-1, however, has been found in 6% of therapynaïve patients at our hospital (7). Assessment of replicative fitness has thus become important for understanding the survival activity of drug-resistant HIV-1 found in therapy-naïve patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such variants cannot form major populations in viral quasi-species when acquired mutations cause severe damage to replicative fitness. Drug-resistant HIV-1, however, has been found in 6% of therapynaïve patients at our hospital (7). Assessment of replicative fitness has thus become important for understanding the survival activity of drug-resistant HIV-1 found in therapy-naïve patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This domain was not only conserved, but duplicated within some mother D sequences. It has been shown that duplication of this domain could be linked to antiretroviral drug resistance [ 54 , 55 , 64 ]. However since mother D has not been exposed to antiretroviral drugs (Table 1 ), this duplication must have arisen naturally or was present in the virus that was initially transmitted to mother D. It is not known at this point, however, what effect this duplication would have on the budding ability of the virus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotypic drug resistance testing of HIV-1 was performed according to our previously reported methods. 12,13 CNS adverse effects CNS symptoms were assessed using a psychiatric interview and the Symptom Check List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) questionnaire, a widely used scale in psychopathology. 14 Upon initiation of EFV containing therapy, we thoroughly explained CNS adverse effects of EFV to patients.…”
Section: Efv Plasma Level and Genotypic Drug Resistance Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%