2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of distal surface caries in the second molar among referrals for assessment of third molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(25 reference statements)
2
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our results, 52.06% of participants had vertical impaction of MTM followed by mesioangular (38.99%) and horizontal (7.11%) positions in respect to Winter classification [8]. Studies revealed that greater number of mesioangular, horizontal and vertical type of MTM impactions in their studied population and there is no consensus related on this issue in literature [28,29]. Discrepancy be attributed to the differences in ethnicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…According to our results, 52.06% of participants had vertical impaction of MTM followed by mesioangular (38.99%) and horizontal (7.11%) positions in respect to Winter classification [8]. Studies revealed that greater number of mesioangular, horizontal and vertical type of MTM impactions in their studied population and there is no consensus related on this issue in literature [28,29]. Discrepancy be attributed to the differences in ethnicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Vertically located maxillary impacted third molars with an eruption level of position B were related with distal caries on second molars while mesioangularly located mandibular molars with position A mostly related with caries. There were studies in the literature which supported the high risk of distal caries on second molars associated with mesioangularly or horizontally located mandibular third molars ( 29 - 31 ). However, the number of studies on maxillary impacted third molars was quite limited.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclination of the impacted MTM to the long axis of the second molar tooth was classified by Winter in 1926, that is, mesioangular, horizontal, distoangular, vertical, obliquity, buccal/lingual transverse, inverse (Winter, 1926). Mesial and horizontal angulations of the MTM are more common than distal and vertical angulations (Iwanaga, Kunisada, et al, 2021;Toedtling et al, 2019). In general, mesially-angulated MTMs are removed by sectioning the tooth close to the cervical area of the tooth or more mesial/superior part of the tooth (meaning zone 1 or 2).…”
Section: Tooth Sectioning/bone Removal and Arterial Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%