2000
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.23.5.705a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of diabetes in adult patients with Down's syndrome living in a residential home.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the six articles reviewed, one used a case–control design (II‐2) (Alexander et al 2016), two used a cohort (II‐2) (Real de Asua et al 2014a, 2014b), and three were case series (III) (Fulcher et al 1998; Ohyama et al 2000; Taggart et al 2013). In the case–control studies, the number of participants with DS ( N = 6,714) and healthy controls ( N = 19,276) were both large.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the six articles reviewed, one used a case–control design (II‐2) (Alexander et al 2016), two used a cohort (II‐2) (Real de Asua et al 2014a, 2014b), and three were case series (III) (Fulcher et al 1998; Ohyama et al 2000; Taggart et al 2013). In the case–control studies, the number of participants with DS ( N = 6,714) and healthy controls ( N = 19,276) were both large.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were ascertained from a longitudinal database (96%), outpatient clinic (1%), anonymous survey (1%), a residential living facility (1%), and a diabetes unit (1%). Two studies included laboratory evaluation (Real de Asua et al 2014a, 2014b); two were from a survey‐based dataset (Alexander et al 2016; Taggart et al 2013); and two involved retrospective chart review (Fulcher et al 1998; Ohyama et al 2000). We assigned interval validity ratings of good to three of the articles, fair to two and poor to one of the studies based upon design considerations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Not unlike other therapeutic considerations in medicine, the potential weight loss and metabolic benefits of bariatric or metabolic surgery must be weighed against potential risks or pitfalls on a case-by-case basis. Interestingly, obesity and its associated co-morbid conditions are prevalent in patients with cognitive impairment, but the risks and benefits of bariatric surgery in this complex group are not well known [1][2][3]. Studies examining outcomes have been limited to case reports, and thus most bariatric programs do not consider patients with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities to be surgical candidates [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Obesity and its related comorbidities are common among individuals with cognitive impairment, but the outcomes from bariatric surgery in this singular group remain uncertain. [3][4][5][6][7] The majority of bariatric programs exclude patients with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities, from surgical indication. Only 6.2% of programs have not considered severe levels of impairment,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%