2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03357-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of depression and associated factors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in eastern Sudan

Abstract: Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) represents a global health threat and burden. It is associated with medical and psychological complications, especially depression. Depression among patients with DM may affect the general prognosis. Hence, we conducted a cross-sectional study in Gadarif, eastern Sudan to evaluate the prevalence of depression and its associated factors among patients with type 2 DM (T2DM). Methods We performed a cross-sectional stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
6
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(71 reference statements)
3
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the finding of current study was higher than the study done in Lithuania 22.4% [ 18 ], Kenya 32.3% [ 39 ] Sudan 35.6% [ 40 ] and south west Ethiopia 34.9% [ 41 ]. The possible reason for the discrepancy might be instrument used, which was in this study used Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), but the study done in Kenya [ 39 ], was used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ- 9), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale questionnaire was used in southwest Ethiopia [ 41 ] and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ- 9) was used in Eastern Sudan [ 40 ]. Study participants, setting and sociocultural difference might be also another possible reason for the discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the finding of current study was higher than the study done in Lithuania 22.4% [ 18 ], Kenya 32.3% [ 39 ] Sudan 35.6% [ 40 ] and south west Ethiopia 34.9% [ 41 ]. The possible reason for the discrepancy might be instrument used, which was in this study used Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), but the study done in Kenya [ 39 ], was used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ- 9), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale questionnaire was used in southwest Ethiopia [ 41 ] and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ- 9) was used in Eastern Sudan [ 40 ]. Study participants, setting and sociocultural difference might be also another possible reason for the discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…The odds of having depression symptoms among respondents with female participants were 1.85 times higher when compared to participants with male gender. This result was supported by a studies conducted in Mexican [ 32 ], Nepal [ 35 ], China [ 37 ], South Africa [ 33 ],Sudan [ 40 ]and southwest Ethiopia [ 41 ]. The possible justification female were grater vulnerable to other psychosocial in additional to hormonal effect [ 8 , 46 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“… 15 Furthermore, the overall unadjusted pooled odd ratio (OR) for the progression of MCI to dementia in those with diabetes was found to be 1.53 (95% CI: 1.20–1.97). 16 In addition, the presence of MCI in T2DM patients can lead to reduced diabetes self‐management and poor glycemic control, 8 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 which may ultimately contribute to poor health‐related outcomes and heavy social and economic burdens. 21 Therefore, early diagnosis of MCI is crucial for T2DM patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…duration of T2DM and diabetic complications), and presence of anxiety and depression may be associated with MCI in T2DM patients. 18 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 However, most of these studies have focused exclusively in identifying the biomarkers involved or determining the associated risk factors. Recent studies have shown that nomogram‐based models with individualized, evidence‐based, and highly accurate risk estimation can facilitate management‐related decision making and medical judgments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation