2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects among Healthcare Workers in the Czech Republic

Abstract: Background: COVID-19 vaccine side effects have a fundamental role in public confidence in the vaccine and its uptake process. Thus far, the evidence on vaccine safety has exclusively been obtained from the manufacturer-sponsored studies; therefore, this study was designed to provide independent evidence on Pfizer–BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine side effects. Methods: A cross-sectional survey-based study was carried out between January and February 2021 to collect data on the side effects following the COVID-19 vacci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

82
329
10
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(427 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
82
329
10
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall prevalence of CoronaVac SEs in this independent study (local: 42.2% and systemic: 40.6%) is significantly lower than mRNA vaccines SEs reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) based on phase III trials, Pfizer-BioNTech (local: 84.7% and systemic: 77.4%) and Moderna (local: 86% and systemic: 66.6%) [23,24]. This is also supported by the findings of our independent study of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine SEs, which showed that 93.1% of all vaccinated healthcare workers in the Czech Republic experienced at least one SE either locally or systemically [17]. Moreover, the SE prevalence of viral vector vaccine of AstraZeneca-Oxford reported by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) was considerably higher than CoronaVac [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall prevalence of CoronaVac SEs in this independent study (local: 42.2% and systemic: 40.6%) is significantly lower than mRNA vaccines SEs reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) based on phase III trials, Pfizer-BioNTech (local: 84.7% and systemic: 77.4%) and Moderna (local: 86% and systemic: 66.6%) [23,24]. This is also supported by the findings of our independent study of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine SEs, which showed that 93.1% of all vaccinated healthcare workers in the Czech Republic experienced at least one SE either locally or systemically [17]. Moreover, the SE prevalence of viral vector vaccine of AstraZeneca-Oxford reported by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) was considerably higher than CoronaVac [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The fourth section explored the short-term local and systemic SEs that emerged after receiving the CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine (the questionnaire is in Table S1). The validation process and psychometric properties of the questionnaire were previously reported in detail [17].…”
Section: Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of studies have assessed mainly the post-vaccination adverse reactions of the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Astrazeneca vaccines [21,22,23,24,25], while only two studies focus on Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine [16,17], There are no published studies yet that have focused on Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine side effects in UAE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A self-administered questionnaire with 28 multiple-choice items was adapted from previous studies on influenza vaccine SEs and the authorization reports of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA) for COVID-19 vaccines [ 18 , 29 ]. The whole process of adaptation, validation and reliability testing of the questionnaire was described in detail previously [ 25 , 30 , 31 ]. Experts panel validation and test re-test reliability were utilized to validate the suggested instrument with a mean Cohen’s kappa coefficient of 0.89 ± 0.13 (0.54–1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%