Abstract:Background
While use of efficacious interventions, including antiretrovirals (ARVs), has reduced dramatically the rate of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV, the safety of in utero ARV exposure remains of concern.
Methods
Data regarding 1112 infants enrolled in the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group (IMPAACT) protocol P1025 born between 2002 and 2007 were analyzed for this study. Congenital anomalies were classified based on the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defe… Show more
“…[5][6][7][8][9][17][18][19] The reasons underlying this variability may include the variable definition of birth defects, underreporting, the selective reporting of cases with defects, differential use of diagnostic techniques in the ascertainment of defects, and variable concomitant medication and substance exposure. 19 We also evaluated other potential predictors of birth defects, such as age, recent substance use, time since HIV diagnosis, CD4 cell count, body mass index, and coinfections. Overall, as for other studies in HIV infection, no maternal risk factors for birth defects were identified.…”
Objective We used data from a national study of pregnant women with HIV to evaluate the prevalence of congenital abnormalities in newborns from women with HIV infection.Design Observational study.Setting University and hospital clinics.Population Pregnant women with HIV exposed to antiretroviral treatment at any time during pregnancy.Methods The total prevalence of birth defects was assessed on live births, stillbirths, and elective terminations for fetal anomaly. The associations between potentially predictive variables and the occurrence of birth defects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for exposed versus unexposed cases, calculated in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.Main outcome measures Birth defects, defined according to the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry criteria.Results A total of 1257 pregnancies with exposure at any time to antiretroviral therapy were evaluated. Forty-two cases with major defects were observed. The total prevalence was 3.2% (95% CI 1.9-4.5) for exposure to any antiretroviral drug during the first trimester (23 cases with defects) and 3.4% (95% CI 1.9-4.9) for no antiretroviral exposure during the first trimester (19 cases). No associations were found between major birth defects and firsttrimester exposure to any antiretroviral treatment (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.51-1.75), main drug classes (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.51-1.76; non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.56-2.55; protease inhibitors, OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.43-1.95), and individual drugs, including efavirenz (prevalence for efavirenz, 2.5%).Conclusions This study adds further support to the assumption that first-trimester exposure to antiretroviral treatment does not increase the risk of congenital abnormalities.
“…[5][6][7][8][9][17][18][19] The reasons underlying this variability may include the variable definition of birth defects, underreporting, the selective reporting of cases with defects, differential use of diagnostic techniques in the ascertainment of defects, and variable concomitant medication and substance exposure. 19 We also evaluated other potential predictors of birth defects, such as age, recent substance use, time since HIV diagnosis, CD4 cell count, body mass index, and coinfections. Overall, as for other studies in HIV infection, no maternal risk factors for birth defects were identified.…”
Objective We used data from a national study of pregnant women with HIV to evaluate the prevalence of congenital abnormalities in newborns from women with HIV infection.Design Observational study.Setting University and hospital clinics.Population Pregnant women with HIV exposed to antiretroviral treatment at any time during pregnancy.Methods The total prevalence of birth defects was assessed on live births, stillbirths, and elective terminations for fetal anomaly. The associations between potentially predictive variables and the occurrence of birth defects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for exposed versus unexposed cases, calculated in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.Main outcome measures Birth defects, defined according to the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry criteria.Results A total of 1257 pregnancies with exposure at any time to antiretroviral therapy were evaluated. Forty-two cases with major defects were observed. The total prevalence was 3.2% (95% CI 1.9-4.5) for exposure to any antiretroviral drug during the first trimester (23 cases with defects) and 3.4% (95% CI 1.9-4.9) for no antiretroviral exposure during the first trimester (19 cases). No associations were found between major birth defects and firsttrimester exposure to any antiretroviral treatment (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.51-1.75), main drug classes (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.51-1.76; non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.56-2.55; protease inhibitors, OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.43-1.95), and individual drugs, including efavirenz (prevalence for efavirenz, 2.5%).Conclusions This study adds further support to the assumption that first-trimester exposure to antiretroviral treatment does not increase the risk of congenital abnormalities.
“…But, it was also found several medications which might cause congenital anomaly in other studies such as NSAID. 6 NSAID might cause cleft lip, spine anomaly, and others. 6 Antiretroviral consumption might also cause congenital anomaly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 NSAID might cause cleft lip, spine anomaly, and others. 6 Antiretroviral consumption might also cause congenital anomaly. 7 However, there are several medications which might prevent congenital anomaly prevalence, for example, folic acid consumption in pre-conception time.…”
Background: Congenital anomaly is a disease of structural or functional alteration since birth. The cause of congenital anomaly is genetic, environtment, and unknown. The cause of congenital anomaly is unknown, made congenital anomaly is difficult to detect. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify the suspectable risk factors of congenital anomaly.
“…Chez la femme, les données sont encore discordantes : après la description de quelques cas cliniques d'anomalies neurologiques, la méta-analyse d'une série de cohortes et d'un registre déclaratif américain suggère l'absence de risque [10]. Plus récemment, deux cohortes -dont la cohorte EPF-ANRS -démentent toutefois cette analyse et retrouvent un risque significatif [11,12]. Ces doutes doivent être levés rapidement.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.