2018
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2018/37826.12396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Class I and II Integrons among MDR Enterobacter cloacae Isolates Obtained from Clinical Samples of Children in Kermanshah, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a significant relationship was revealed between the presence of the intI2 gene and higher rates of drug resistance against only two antibiotics (Table 3). In line with these results, Mortazavi et al (2018) showed that 58.3% of E. cloacae isolates harbored class I integron; however, none of them had class II integron [40] . In the present research, the intI3 gene was not detected in any of the isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, a significant relationship was revealed between the presence of the intI2 gene and higher rates of drug resistance against only two antibiotics (Table 3). In line with these results, Mortazavi et al (2018) showed that 58.3% of E. cloacae isolates harbored class I integron; however, none of them had class II integron [40] . In the present research, the intI3 gene was not detected in any of the isolates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The frequency of Class 1 integron was 64% in this s1tudy, which is supported by the results of other studies conducted in Iran, while Class 2 integron was not detected. There is no evidence about the presence of Class 2 integron among E. cloacae isolates in published studies (1,30) . According to the statistical analysis, the correlation between harboring Class 1 integron and resistance to streptomycin and ciprofloxacin was significant (p value< .05), while resistance to other antibiotics was not correlated with harboring Class 1 integron, and other resistance mechanisms should be responsible for resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes in phenotypically resistant isolates could be due to the presence of other resistance mechanisms, including integrons or genes which has not yet been detected in E. cloacae strains. The prevalence of MDR E. cloacae strains demonstrated an upward trend in the emergence of MDR strains in the clinical samples in Iran in such a way that the rate has increased from zero in 2012 to 75% in 2017 according to the published data [27,[30][31] . Integrons are mostly responsible for the transmission of resistance determinants within species or among different bacterial species or genera.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. cloacae and Enterobacter aerogenes have been identified as major nosocomial pathogens among these bacterial species. E. cloacae is responsible for over 70% of these bacterial infections [ 2 ]. Due to various virulence factors, such as biofilm-forming ability, toxins, cytotoxicity, and hemolysin release, this bacterium can lead to several nosocomial infections, including pneumonia, urinary tract infections, surgical wounds, skin and soft tissue infections, and bacteremia [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%