2013
DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2013.7.2.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of child malnutrition in agro-pastoral households in Afar Regional State of Ethiopia

Abstract: Based on data generated from 180 randomly selected households with children age under five years old in Aysaita district of Afar region of Ethiopia, this study explored prevalence of malnutrition and scrutinized household characteristics, maternal characteristics, specifics of the child and economic variables associated with child malnutrition. The height-for-age Z-scores (HAZ), weight-for-height Z-scores (WHZ) and weight-for-age Z-scores (WAZ) were used to measure the extent of stunting, wasting and underweig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
58
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
12
58
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results, which are confirmed by earlier studies [35][36][37], also highlighted the fact that children born to mothers who gave birth to five or more children had a higher likelihood of being undernourished than children who were born to mothers with fewer children. It seems obvious that families with a large number of children are more vulnerable to economic constraints resulting from the need to fulfill the nutritional needs of the household.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results, which are confirmed by earlier studies [35][36][37], also highlighted the fact that children born to mothers who gave birth to five or more children had a higher likelihood of being undernourished than children who were born to mothers with fewer children. It seems obvious that families with a large number of children are more vulnerable to economic constraints resulting from the need to fulfill the nutritional needs of the household.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Inadequate allocation of household resources among that many children can lead to the low nutritional status. In addition, families with Data are the prevalence of each nutritional status according to mothers' characteristics classes The significance level was set at 0.05 for all the tests more children generally spend less time caring for each child [35]. Maternal characteristics did not exhibit enough variability in our study population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, when family is headed by women themselves, children's nutritional status is better, even in a very poor household. On the other hand, the finding of this current study was in contrast with the finding of a study in Afar (18) which stated that children of female headed family were at higher risk to be malnourished.…”
Section: Stuntingcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This could be due to the reason that fathers who can read and write can be exposed and updated themselves to reading materials such as broachers, posters and other leaflets concerning about nutritional activities and infant and young child feeding practices; so, they can apply it to their children in order to make their children well nourished. This was also found to be consistent with finding of a study done in Afar (18). More notably, sex of the child was found to be determinant factor for underweight in which male children were 2.23 times and 78.9% at increased risk when compared to the female children in both the food secure and food insecure households respectively.…”
Section: Underweightsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, in accordance with the EDHS report [31] and earlier studies in Afar region [39] and northern part of Ethiopia [40] as well as in India [15], Bangladesh [16,25] and Uganda [27], the prevalence of stunting and underweight in the current study is low. On the other hand, the prevalence of wasting is high compared to the national report [31] and other similar studies [23,24,36,38,41,42].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%