2019
DOI: 10.4038/sljid.v9i2.8254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of canine tick-borne haemoparasites in three Divisional Secretariat Divisions (Rambewa, Tirappane, and Galenbidunuwewa) in the Anuradhapura district, Sri Lanka

Abstract: This an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study revealed that over a third of owned dogs in Sri Lanka were positive for B. gibsoni compared to 15% detected by Weerathunga et al [14] using light microscopy in Anuradhapura district. The prevalence of E. canis in owned dogs in Sri Lanka at 4.5% was significantly lower than the previous 17% reported for 'apparently healthy' stray dogs in the country using nested PCR [11] and 24.5% using microscopy by Weerathunga et al [14]. This discrepancy might be explained due to differences in study cohorts (owned versus stray dogs) in the former and the low specificity (high-false positivity rate) of microscopic identification of E. canis morulae in the latter.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study revealed that over a third of owned dogs in Sri Lanka were positive for B. gibsoni compared to 15% detected by Weerathunga et al [14] using light microscopy in Anuradhapura district. The prevalence of E. canis in owned dogs in Sri Lanka at 4.5% was significantly lower than the previous 17% reported for 'apparently healthy' stray dogs in the country using nested PCR [11] and 24.5% using microscopy by Weerathunga et al [14]. This discrepancy might be explained due to differences in study cohorts (owned versus stray dogs) in the former and the low specificity (high-false positivity rate) of microscopic identification of E. canis morulae in the latter.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…In addition, this study attributes B. vogeli as the large Babesia species infecting dogs in Sri Lanka, which has to date, been likely misclassified as B. canis using light microscopy [7,14]. This study revealed that over a third of owned dogs in Sri Lanka were positive for B. gibsoni compared to 15% detected by Weerathunga et al [14] using light microscopy in Anuradhapura district.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations