2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in a cross-sectional study of dogs attending veterinary practices in the UK and risk indicators associated with shedding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

24
67
3
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
24
67
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…in a group of healthy dogs using PCR. 22 However, studies of healthy dogs in the United Kingdom and Ireland, also using PCR, have shown a high prevalence of infection (upwards of 40% in some cases) with both C. jejuni and C. upsaliensis , 29,30 similar to what was found in this study. The potential Campylobacter spp.-related zoonotic risk associated with canine feces is also supported by the intensity of infection in many of the samples.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…in a group of healthy dogs using PCR. 22 However, studies of healthy dogs in the United Kingdom and Ireland, also using PCR, have shown a high prevalence of infection (upwards of 40% in some cases) with both C. jejuni and C. upsaliensis , 29,30 similar to what was found in this study. The potential Campylobacter spp.-related zoonotic risk associated with canine feces is also supported by the intensity of infection in many of the samples.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The frequency of isolation of Campylobacter spp. in dogs varied from 17% (Brazil, Argentina) to 76.2% (Denmark), while in cats isolation values ranged from 8% in Brazil to 47.8% in Germany (Moser et al 2001, Aquino et al 2002, Lopez et al 2002, Sandberg et al 2002, Engvall et al 2003, Hald et al 2004, Wieland et al 2005, Workman et al 2005, Acke et al 2009, Chaban et al 2010, Parsons et al 2010, Salihu et al 2010. The prevalence of Campylobacter spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, two were obtained from household pets (43) (Table 1), three were from a cross-sectional study of dogs visiting veterinary practices (30), and 11 were from longitudinal and cross-sectional studies of boarding and rescue kennels. A further 17 isolates were obtained from three hunt kennels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further 17 isolates were obtained from three hunt kennels. Samples were cultured using several different isolation methods as previously described (30). Briefly, the methods were as follows: (i) campylobacter selective agar (Lab M) with the addition of cefoperazone and amphotericin (Lab M) and (ii) filtration through a 0.7-m nitrocellulose membrane onto campylobacter-selective agar as described previously, with the addition of teicoplanin (Oxoid Ltd.) supplement, were used to isolate Campylobacter spp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%