2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and stroke risk assessment based on telemedicine screening tools in a primary healthcare setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical factors that we identified allow to improve patient targeting in screening initiatives, and this may facilitate the organizational aspects, which have to consider as key elements the specificity of the setting, the need for adequate information to potential candidates on the scope and implications of screening, as well as the definition of pathways for direct referral after AF diagnosis to physicians (general practitioners or cardiologists) in charge of clinical evaluation and decision making [22,35]. Our standard for AF diagnosis was the 12-lead ECG, in line with current European guidelines [14] and previous experiences [30,36]. For practical reasons we did not adopt the alternative possibility of AF diagnosis based on a single-lead ECG tracing showing AF with at least 30 s duration, analyzed by an expert in ECG reading [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical factors that we identified allow to improve patient targeting in screening initiatives, and this may facilitate the organizational aspects, which have to consider as key elements the specificity of the setting, the need for adequate information to potential candidates on the scope and implications of screening, as well as the definition of pathways for direct referral after AF diagnosis to physicians (general practitioners or cardiologists) in charge of clinical evaluation and decision making [22,35]. Our standard for AF diagnosis was the 12-lead ECG, in line with current European guidelines [14] and previous experiences [30,36]. For practical reasons we did not adopt the alternative possibility of AF diagnosis based on a single-lead ECG tracing showing AF with at least 30 s duration, analyzed by an expert in ECG reading [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As known, RM can be used with the purpose of remote device check or for monitoring patients' status (heart rhythm, fluid overload, right ventricular pressure, oximetry, etc. ), thus with a shift from strictly device-centred follow-up to perspectives centred on the patient (and patient-device interactions) [23][24][25][26][27][28]. The organization of disease management of heart failure, though RM in patients with implanted devices is complex, requires an interplay between the competence on devices and heart failure management and, therefore, should be object of promotion for the post-COVID-19 recovery phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this subset of participants from EMMA study, we found just one participant under NOAC. Although NOACs are available in Brazil for more than a decade, as previously reported by other authors 31 , its use is low or almost inexistent among people with low-socioeconomic status because, unlike warfarin, there is no free availability of NOACs in Brazilian primary care units. A recent primary care-based cross-sectional study (2009-2016) reaffirmed our data.…”
Section: Af Related Stroke Outcomes and Anticoagulationmentioning
confidence: 91%