2011
DOI: 10.4314/afrrev.v5i4.69267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Secondary School Students in Benin City

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall prevalence of UTI in this study was found to be 21.1%; which was in agreement with the findings of the previous studies conducted in Ethiopia from the general population (23.32%) [35]; Keffi, Nigeria (20%) [36] and Ogun State, Nigeria (25%) [37]; India (19.8%) [13] and (22%) [38]. However, our finding was higher than other earlier studies reported in Southeast Nigeria (13.8%) [39]; and BeninCity, Nigeria (11%) [40] and (8.25%) [41]. But it was lower compared to other studies done in Nigeria, Imo State University (28%) [20] southeastern Nigeria (78%) [42].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…The overall prevalence of UTI in this study was found to be 21.1%; which was in agreement with the findings of the previous studies conducted in Ethiopia from the general population (23.32%) [35]; Keffi, Nigeria (20%) [36] and Ogun State, Nigeria (25%) [37]; India (19.8%) [13] and (22%) [38]. However, our finding was higher than other earlier studies reported in Southeast Nigeria (13.8%) [39]; and BeninCity, Nigeria (11%) [40] and (8.25%) [41]. But it was lower compared to other studies done in Nigeria, Imo State University (28%) [20] southeastern Nigeria (78%) [42].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…In Cameroon, high prevalence Epidemiological Survey of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Patna, India (35.2 -58.3%) of bacteriuria has been reported [14,17]. On the contrary, the prevalence of ASB in this study is higher than that of some studies which recorded 5.3 -26% in diabetics and 3.5 -15% in non-diabetics [3,4,18,19,20].Consequently, the issue of prevalence of ASB remains debatable. This inconsistency has been attributed due to variations in sample size, geographical location, culture or screening method [11].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…14,17 On the contrary, the prevalence of ASB in this study is higher than that of some studies which recorded 5.3 -26% in diabetics and 3.5-15% in nondiabetics. 3,4,18,19,20 Consequently, the issue of prevalence of ASB remains debatable. This inconsistency has been attributed to variations in sample size, geographical location, culture or screening method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%