2008
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a0801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Asymmetry of Mamillary Body and Fornix Size on MR Imaging

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Mamillary body and fornix asymmetry are frequent findings on MR imaging of the brain. We sought to determine the prevalence of asymmetry of the fornix and mamillary body on MR imaging in patients with or without seizures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following findings may also suggest MTS: 1) hippocampal T2-weighted/FLAIR signalintensity abnormalities, 2) loss of the crenated margin of the upper surface of the hippocampus, 3) gray matter-white matter blurring, 4) malrotation of the hippocampus, 5) ipsilateral mammillary body and fornical column volume loss, and 6) unilateral temporal horn dilation (sometimes as secondary findings of volume loss in the limbic system). [21][22][23] The ability to detect changes suggestive of MTS has been shown to be significantly correlated with the experience of the reader and the quality of the study. For example, Von Oertzen et al 24 have shown that the sensitivity for detection of MTS varies between 39% and 50% when comparing nonexpert and dedicated epilepsy expert readers of standard brain MRI, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following findings may also suggest MTS: 1) hippocampal T2-weighted/FLAIR signalintensity abnormalities, 2) loss of the crenated margin of the upper surface of the hippocampus, 3) gray matter-white matter blurring, 4) malrotation of the hippocampus, 5) ipsilateral mammillary body and fornical column volume loss, and 6) unilateral temporal horn dilation (sometimes as secondary findings of volume loss in the limbic system). [21][22][23] The ability to detect changes suggestive of MTS has been shown to be significantly correlated with the experience of the reader and the quality of the study. For example, Von Oertzen et al 24 have shown that the sensitivity for detection of MTS varies between 39% and 50% when comparing nonexpert and dedicated epilepsy expert readers of standard brain MRI, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the present study used a 1.0-mm-volume scan for comparison purposes, previous MR imaging studies of the mammillary bodies have used a variety of section thicknesses (1.0 mm, 31 1.1 mm, 28 1.5 mm, 29,30,32, and 3.0 mm 26,27 ). Other differences included the use of a 3T imaging system because previous MR imagingϪbased measurements of mammillary body volume have used 1.5T systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29][30][31][32] An additional MR imaging sequence was used to acquire intracranial volume data for normalizing the data for differences in head size across patients and controls. This sequence was a T2-weighted intracranial volume scan; parameters were TR, 3000 ms; TE, 102 ms; FA, 150°; 3-mm section thickness; 10-mm section gap; acquisition time, 2 minutes.…”
Section: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 Although asymmetry of the mammillary bodies and fornices is highly associated with MTS, this could also be seen as a normal variation or congenital abnormality. 8 In this study, we present epileptic focus in mammillary body with refractory epilepsy on 18 F-FDG PET/CT, which is a very unusual site for seizure.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 85%