2019
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2018-211819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of antenatal depression in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: ObjectiveTo estimate the prevalence of antenatal depression in South Asia and to examine variations by country and study characteristics to inform policy, practice and future research.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of 13 databases including international databases and databases covering scientific literature from South Asian countries in addition to Google Scholar and grey sources from 1 January 2007 to 31 May 2018. Studies reporting prevalence estimates of antenatal depression using a validated di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(29 reference statements)
5
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The full texts of the remaining 140 citations were evaluated, and 117 articles were excluded, which did not fulfill the eligibility criteria. Finally, 23 articles meeting all the criteria were recruited in this umbrella review (see Table 3), including 12 systematic reviews (Aggarwal and Berk, 2015;Arora and Aeri, 2019;Hossain et al, 2017Hossain et al, , 2014Math and Srinivasaraju, 2010;Mills et al, 2008;Mirza and Jenkins, 2004;Nadkarni et al, 2013;Naskar et al, 2017;Newman, 2013;Rajapakse et al, 2013;Thapa et al, 2018) and 11 meta-analyses (Chauhan et al, 2019;Ganguli, 2000;Hendrickson et al, 2019;Hussain et al, 2018;Mahendran et al, 2019;Malhotra and Patra, 2014;Pilania et al, 2019;Prabhu et al, 2019;Ranjan and Asthana, 2017;Reddy and Chandrashekar, 1998;Upadhyay et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The full texts of the remaining 140 citations were evaluated, and 117 articles were excluded, which did not fulfill the eligibility criteria. Finally, 23 articles meeting all the criteria were recruited in this umbrella review (see Table 3), including 12 systematic reviews (Aggarwal and Berk, 2015;Arora and Aeri, 2019;Hossain et al, 2017Hossain et al, , 2014Math and Srinivasaraju, 2010;Mills et al, 2008;Mirza and Jenkins, 2004;Nadkarni et al, 2013;Naskar et al, 2017;Newman, 2013;Rajapakse et al, 2013;Thapa et al, 2018) and 11 meta-analyses (Chauhan et al, 2019;Ganguli, 2000;Hendrickson et al, 2019;Hussain et al, 2018;Mahendran et al, 2019;Malhotra and Patra, 2014;Pilania et al, 2019;Prabhu et al, 2019;Ranjan and Asthana, 2017;Reddy and Chandrashekar, 1998;Upadhyay et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the reviews evaluated mental disorders in India (n = 13), followed by two studies on Bangladesh (Hossain et al, 2014;Newman, 2013), one study each from Nepal (Thapa et al, 2018), Pakistan (Mirza and Jenkins, 2004), and Sri Lanka (Rajapakse et al, 2013). One study evaluated mental disorders among Bhutanese refugees living in Nepal (Mills et al, 2008), and four studies evaluated mental disorders in multiple South Asian nations (Hossain et al, 2017;Mahendran et al, 2019;Prabhu et al, 2019;Ranjan and Asthana, 2017). The quality evaluation found one study with low quality, nine studies with high quality, and remaining (n = 13) studies with medium quality (see Supplementary material).…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Recruited Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Meta-analysis is a useful tool for the detection of disease − gene relationships [16]. In the Chinese Han population, one meta-analysis showed no association between the RGS4 gene and the risk of schizophrenia [15]; however, in another meta-analysis, the SNP, rs951436, was found to be associated with the risk of schizophrenia [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%