2009
DOI: 10.1002/art.24853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain

Abstract: Objective. To determine the prevalence of serious pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain, and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of recommended "red flag" screening questions.Methods. An inception cohort of 1,172 consecutive patients receiving primary care for acute low back pain was recruited from primary care clinics in Sydney, Australia. At the initial consultation, clinicians recorded responses to 25 red flag questions and then provided an initial diagnosis. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
261
3
25

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 375 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
7
261
3
25
Order By: Relevance
“…In the vast majority of patients with low back pain, symptoms can be attributed to non-specific mechanical factors. However, in a much smaller percentage of patients, the cause of back pain may be something more serious, such as cancer, 79 cauda equina syndrome, 81 spinal infection, 303 spinal compression fractures, 142 spinal stress fractures, 143 ankylosing spondylitis, 125 or aneurysm. 94 Clinical findings that increase the level of suspicion that there is a serious medical condition presenting as common, non-serious, musculoskeletal conditions, are commonly described as “red flags.” Table 4 lists serious medical conditions that can cause low back pain and their associated red flags.…”
Section: Clinical Guidelines: Impairment/function-based Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the vast majority of patients with low back pain, symptoms can be attributed to non-specific mechanical factors. However, in a much smaller percentage of patients, the cause of back pain may be something more serious, such as cancer, 79 cauda equina syndrome, 81 spinal infection, 303 spinal compression fractures, 142 spinal stress fractures, 143 ankylosing spondylitis, 125 or aneurysm. 94 Clinical findings that increase the level of suspicion that there is a serious medical condition presenting as common, non-serious, musculoskeletal conditions, are commonly described as “red flags.” Table 4 lists serious medical conditions that can cause low back pain and their associated red flags.…”
Section: Clinical Guidelines: Impairment/function-based Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An Australian population-based prospective cohort study of 1172 consecutive patients presenting to primary care for low back pain calculated the increased probability of fracture when a combination of red flags were positive [43]. When any three of the red flags 'female', 'age [70', 'severe trauma', and 'prolonged use of corticosteroids' were present, the probability of fracture increased from 4 % (pre-test) to 90 % (95 % CI 34-99 %).…”
Section: Comparison With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the majority of guidelines inferred that the presence of a red flag was absolute by recommending further diagnostic workup (e.g., advanced imaging). Given that up to 80 % of patients presenting to primary care may have at least one positive red flag [43], when combined with weak evidence in support of many red flags, this advice may cause harm to many patients through unnecessary imaging (increased radiation and health care costs), unnecessary alarming the patients (resulting in reduction of quality of life) and unnecessary treatment (including unnecessary surgery) [42,44].…”
Section: Comparison With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Osteoporotic fractures of the spine are a relatively common presentation in primary care but represent Ͻ1% of the presentations in the study by Henschke and colleagues (6). Clinician judgment, however, has a positive predictive value similar to that of the formulaic red flag-based diagnostic rule (6).…”
Section: Martin Underwoodmentioning
confidence: 93%