2008
DOI: 10.1097/qai.0b013e31817e9b79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Colonization in HIV-Infected Ambulatory Patients

Abstract: The prevalence of MRSA nasal colonization was relatively high compared with prior studies; axillary colonization was rare. Prior staphylococcal infection (methicillin-susceptible S. aureus or MRSA), not receiving antibiotics, and lower CD4 count were associated with MRSA nasal colonization. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole seemed to be protective of MRSA colonization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

6
50
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
50
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At 11.5% prevalence, the USA500/Iberian type was the most frequently isolated strain in our population, representing 48.0% of the MRSA isolates recovered from the groin and 57.4% from the nares. This is higher than the reported prevalence of USA500 among HIV-infected patients in Dallas, TX, and New York City (range, 4.8 to 5.6%) (8,49) but lower than the reported prevalence (19%) among general patients screened at admission to another Atlanta-area hospital (21), and both USA300 and USA500 colonization has been associated with HIV infection (36).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 11.5% prevalence, the USA500/Iberian type was the most frequently isolated strain in our population, representing 48.0% of the MRSA isolates recovered from the groin and 57.4% from the nares. This is higher than the reported prevalence of USA500 among HIV-infected patients in Dallas, TX, and New York City (range, 4.8 to 5.6%) (8,49) but lower than the reported prevalence (19%) among general patients screened at admission to another Atlanta-area hospital (21), and both USA300 and USA500 colonization has been associated with HIV infection (36).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Several studies have demonstrated that culture of samples from additional body sites, such as the throat, axilla, perineum, or groin, in addition to the nares, increased the sensitivity of S. aureus detection, with improvements ranging from 5 to 25% (6,28,37). However, others have found that the addition of a specimen from a second body site had little impact on the overall sensitivity of MRSA recovery (8). Although other colonization studies have demonstrated a dramatic increase in MRSA detection when throat swabs were cultured in addition to the nasal swabs, we specifically sought to address the impact of carriage site on MRSA strain types and thought that strains carried in the nose and throat were likely to be the same.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…37,38 Low levels of TMP/SXT resistance is consistent with data from high-income countries demonstrating that communityacquired strains of MRSA, containing the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IV, are more likely to be TMP-SXT susceptible versus other SCCmec types. 39,40 Further research is warranted to determine whether TMP-SXT may have a protective effect on S. aureus nasal colonization when used as Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis among HIV-infected children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIV-infected patients also appear to be at increased risk for persistent S. aureus nasal colonization [23] and for recurrent S. aureus infections at low CD4 + cell counts [24]. Because of increased risk for S. aureus and MRSA colonization among HIV-infected patients [19,25,26], we assessed the impact that CA-MRSA has had on this population. We performed a community and hospital study to evaluate the epidemiology of CA-MRSA in HIV-infected patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%