Prevalence of Anatomical Abnormalities of Nose &amp; Paranasal Sinuses in Cases of Rhinogenic Headache Among Sohag University Students

Bakheet, Eslam; Bakheet, Tasneem Mohammed

doi:10.21608/smj.2019.16715.1056

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…La cefalea rinogénica requiere un enfoque multidisciplinario, una historia clínica completa, una endoscopia nasal bien realizada y una TAC de los senos paranasales (2,3,7). Adicionalmente, Chow y Clerico describen la aplicación de anestésico como parte del diagnóstico de esta entidad, así como el test de lidocaína en el punto de contacto es una prueba efectiva, un test positivo ha demostrado la mejoría de los síntomas en el 98 % en los pacientes llevados a cirugía (4).…”

Section: Discusión Y Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified

Cefalea rinogénica causada por mucopiocele en concha bullosa, un origen infrecuente. Reporte de caso

Ramirez Merlano,

Delgado,

Cortes

2023

Acta otorrinolaringol cir cabeza cuello

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introducción: la cefalea rinogénica es secundaria al contacto permanente de la mucosa nasal y puede ser secundario a concha bullosa, si se infecta puede ser mucocele o mucopiocele. Caso clínico: paciente de 34 años con cefalea hemicraneal izquierda, dolor periocular ipsilateral, congestión y rinorrea hialina con cambios en consistencia y coloración del moco. En la tomografía computarizada (TAC) de senos paranasales (SPN) desviación septal derecha por concha bullosa izquierda, ocupación de líquido. Se sospecho mucocele y cefalea rinogénica secundaria, prueba de lidocaína positiva. Se detecto por cultivo, Eikenella corrodens. Manejo con antibiótico y posterior resolución de patología. Conclusiones: debe incluirse en el diagnóstico diferencial de cefalea y concha bullosa, realizarse endoscopia nasal y TAC de SPN. El manejo quirúrgico ha demostrado reducir la intensidad y la frecuencia de la cefalea a corto y largo plazo, y es exitoso si hay test de lidocaína positivo.

show abstract

Section: Discusión Y Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified

Cefalea rinogénica causada por mucopiocele en concha bullosa, un origen infrecuente. Reporte de caso

Ramirez Merlano,

Delgado,

Cortes

2023

Acta otorrinolaringol cir cabeza cuello

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…*DNS=deviated-nasal-septum/CB=concha-bullosa/UP=uncinate-process; p-value significant = ≤ 0.05/ρ=r=rho=Pearson correlation co-efficient. few years [11][12][13] . The results of the current study are witnessing that anatomical variants are the reason for the rhinogenic headache in sinusitis patients.…”

Section: Table 2: Correlation Between Right and Left-sided Anatomical...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Anatomical Variations of Rhinogenic Headache and Its Relation with Sinusitis: A Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan Study

2022

PJMD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Variable anatomy, hallmark of sinonasal region is the reason for the etiology of sinonasal symptoms such as rhinogenic headache. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of anatomical variations of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses in sinusitis patients with complaint of rhinogenic headache on computed tomography of paranasal sinuses, and the correlation of these variants with a rhinogenic headache. Methods:A prospective cross-sectional study (n=50) of 18-60 years having sinusitis with rhinogenic headache was steered at the Department of Radiology in the PNS Shifa Hospital of Karachi, Pakistan, between June-December 2021. After obtaining written informed consent, all subjects were investigated for various anatomical variants of the sinonasal region detected on computed tomographic scans of paranasal sinuses and were correlated with a rhinogenic headache. The Chi-square test and Pearson correlation were applied for statistical analysis and the level of significance was set at p≤ 0.05. Results:The most common anatomical variant of sinonasal region detected was agger nasi cells 32(64%) (Right: ρ/r -0.24, p =0.09; Left: ρ/r -0.28, p = 0.04), followed by deviated nasal septum 28(56%) (ρ/r 0.04, p= 0.75), concha bullosa 23(46%) (ρ/r 0.07, p=0.59), deviated nasal septum with bony spur (ρ/r 0.07, p=0.62) and other variants. The overall, study found male (68%) predominance. Significant association existed between rhinogenic headache and some of the anatomical variants along with sinus mucosal thickening (p<0.05). Conclusion:The significant association (p<0.05) was found between rhinogenic headache and different anatomical variants like agger nasi cells, left-sided agger nasi cells, right-sided Haller's cells, left-sided maxillary and ethmoid sinusitis.

show abstract

Prevalence of Anatomical Abnormalities of Nose & Paranasal Sinuses in Cases of Rhinogenic Headache Among Sohag University Students

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Cefalea rinogénica causada por mucopiocele en concha bullosa, un origen infrecuente. Reporte de caso

Cefalea rinogénica causada por mucopiocele en concha bullosa, un origen infrecuente. Reporte de caso

Anatomical Variations of Rhinogenic Headache and Its Relation with Sinusitis: A Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About