1993
DOI: 10.1136/jech.47.1.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of age related macular degeneration in persons aged 50 years and over resident in Australia.

Abstract: Study objective-The aim was to determine, employing non-invasive procedures, the prevalence of age related macular degeneration in persons 50 years of age and over.Design-A clinical investigation and a retrospective examination of ophthalmological records were employed in this study.Setting-The study was conducted over the period 1988 to 1990 Other studies have computed rates for age related macular degeneration from samples which did not have an upper age limit.5 6 However, in both of these studies the samp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1995). In accordance with our results, Mitchell (1993) found that 19% of persons aged 75–84 and 26% of those aged 85 and older had ARM, based on case records. In other previous studies, the prevalence of all ARM was considerably higher because early macular changes assessed with ophthalmoscopy or fundus photographs were included.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1995). In accordance with our results, Mitchell (1993) found that 19% of persons aged 75–84 and 26% of those aged 85 and older had ARM, based on case records. In other previous studies, the prevalence of all ARM was considerably higher because early macular changes assessed with ophthalmoscopy or fundus photographs were included.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The high prevalence of ARM in people aged 75 and older is consistent with most previous studies reporting prevalence rates for both all and late ARM (Klein et al 1992c;Mitchell et al 1995;Vingerling et al 1995). In accordance with our results, Mitchell (1993) found that 19% of persons aged 75-84 and 26% of those aged 85 and older had ARM, based on case records. In other previous studies, the prevalence of all ARM was considerably higher because early macular changes assessed with ophthalmoscopy or fundus photographs were included.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Chronic Eye Diseasessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is significantly lower than in Australia, 21 and in addition, the proportion of those with Pitcairn Island ancestry with AMD was considerably lower than those without Pitcairn Island ancestry. There is a strong genetic component to the etiology of AMD, with common polymorphisms in the CFH gene accounting for approximately half of all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Most studies give prevalences for early plus late AMD between the ages of 70 and 80 years between 25 and 40%. Only the RS [14] and the Blue Mountain Study in Australia [28] reported prevalences between 10 and 20%, as did the smaller Hisayama Study [29]. Blacks were mostly reported to have a lower prevalence of AMD, but later reports suggested that this holds only for late AMD [30,31].…”
Section: Racementioning
confidence: 99%