2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rceng.2018.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with high cardiovascular risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on our results, the frequency of AAA in our study population was 2.2%. In a review by Sprynger et al in 2019, the prevalence of the AAA in elderly population older than 65 years of age in the Europe was reported to decrease to 4% in the last decades, but there are still reports about that it may reach up to 8% associated with the study population's characteristics [12–14] . Our patients were recruited from our cardiology department's echocardiography laboratory, and had very heterogenous clinical backgrounds and indications for echocardiographic assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our results, the frequency of AAA in our study population was 2.2%. In a review by Sprynger et al in 2019, the prevalence of the AAA in elderly population older than 65 years of age in the Europe was reported to decrease to 4% in the last decades, but there are still reports about that it may reach up to 8% associated with the study population's characteristics [12–14] . Our patients were recruited from our cardiology department's echocardiography laboratory, and had very heterogenous clinical backgrounds and indications for echocardiographic assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La prevalencia de aneurismas en nuestra muestra se situó en el 2,6% (11 pacientes identificados en el cribado y otros cinco a los que no se les realizó por estar ya intervenidos). Comparando con la prevalencia de aneurismas de otros estudios 11 , 13 , 14 , la prevalencia en nuestra muestra es baja. Pensamos que como la muestra no fue aleatoria, a pesar de priorizar a pacientes con riesgo conocido, puedan ser pacientes con una situación basal mejor y con un mejor control de los factores de riesgo, ya que son los pacientes que acuden con más asiduidad al centro los que se captaron con más facilidad.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La prevalencia estimada en diversos estudios de nuestro medio se sitúa entre el 4-8% 11 , 13 , 14 , en función del perfil de riesgo de los pacientes incluidos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified