2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2018.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, management, and outcomes of familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with acute coronary syndromes in the Arabian Gulf

Abstract: In Arabian Gulf citizens, FH was common in ACS patients, was undertreated, and was associated with a worse 1-year prognosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results in 232 individuals with genetically verified FH who had experienced a first-time AMI support and extend (with 17 years of follow-up) previous results in individuals with probable FH [7,8,[14][15][16][17][18][19]. Rerup and co-workers found that individuals with probable FH had a 1.28-fold increased risk of recurrent AMI after a median of 3.3 years of follow-up [8], whereas Danchin and co-workers found a 2.2-fold increased risk of the combined outcome death or recurrent major cardiovascular events after 5 years of follow-up in probable FH [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These results in 232 individuals with genetically verified FH who had experienced a first-time AMI support and extend (with 17 years of follow-up) previous results in individuals with probable FH [7,8,[14][15][16][17][18][19]. Rerup and co-workers found that individuals with probable FH had a 1.28-fold increased risk of recurrent AMI after a median of 3.3 years of follow-up [8], whereas Danchin and co-workers found a 2.2-fold increased risk of the combined outcome death or recurrent major cardiovascular events after 5 years of follow-up in probable FH [7].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A retrospective cohort study of 202 patients with ACS in China demonstrated that patients were more likely to achieve LDL-C goal if they were receiving ezetimibe plus statin (69.1%, P = 0.007) or intensive statin therapy (67.9%, P = 0.047) compared with moderate-intensity statin (46.9%) [31]. Consistent results were reported for a prospective cohort study in 84 Chinese patients with [109,110] 90.7 [110] 100 [89] ACS acute coronary syndrome a For studies that recorded percentage statin use over more than 1 time period, the data for the most recent time period are presented [34]. Rates of statin use were similar in the three groups at discharge (96-98%) and at 1 year post ACS (93-96%); however, goal attainment rates differed between the groups (P \ 0.001); 23% of patients in whom FH was unlikely achieved their LDL-C goal, compared with 13% and 12% of patients with probable and possible FH, respectively.…”
Section: Use Of High-intensity Lmt Statin Therapymentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Auckle et al [ 33 ] reported poorer LDL-C goal achievement (< 1.8 mmol/L or > 50% reduction) with moderate potency LMT at 1 year post STEMI in patients with possible FH compared with those without FH (18.7% vs. 51.4%) in China. In a separate study, patients ( n = 3224) from the GULF COAST registry (2012–2013) were stratified by FH status (probable, possible or unlikely) [ 34 ]. Rates of statin use were similar in the three groups at discharge (96–98%) and at 1 year post ACS (93–96%); however, goal attainment rates differed between the groups ( P < 0.001); 23% of patients in whom FH was unlikely achieved their LDL-C goal, compared with 13% and 12% of patients with probable and possible FH, respectively.…”
Section: Current State Of Dyslipidaemia Management Post Acs In Countrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For risk factors, Gulf PREVENT will quantify the relative contribution and population attributable risk percentage associated with premature MI, with emphasis on diabetes, obesity, and familial hypercholesterolemia, given their growing prevalence in the Middle East. 34,37 We aim to enroll 400 cases (men 18-55 years; women 18-65 years, with first MI) and a similar number of controls matched by age (+5 years), sex, and nationality. Myocardial infarction will be determined by symptoms, cardiac biomarkers, and electrocardiographic criteria outlined by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology.…”
Section: Rationale For the Gulf Prevent Studymentioning
confidence: 99%