2013
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.001180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, Incidence, and Implications of Silent Myocardial Infarctions in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the prevalence of SMI among people with diabetes seems to be higher compared with those who are nondiabetic, 6,16,25 and they have been reported to have high rates of asymptomatic myocardial ischemia. 8 Nonetheless, diabetes was not more prevalent in individuals with SMI than without SMI in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In general, the prevalence of SMI among people with diabetes seems to be higher compared with those who are nondiabetic, 6,16,25 and they have been reported to have high rates of asymptomatic myocardial ischemia. 8 Nonetheless, diabetes was not more prevalent in individuals with SMI than without SMI in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…1 Any phenotype of heart disease significantly associate with diabetes, as recently confirmed in a wide population study, by Shah et al 2 It is also well documented that coronary heart disease (CHD) in diabetes is more severe, 3 and more frequent than in non-diabetic subjects: about 75% of diabetic patients without a diagnosis of CHD show high-grade atherosclerotic coronary lesions, at post-mortem examination. 4 The prevalence of asymptomatic CHD in this population is round 20%, in most studies, [5][6][7][8][9] a figure higher than the non-diabetic individuals; therefore in type 2 diabetes the presence of silent myocardial ischemia is highly probable. Asymptomatic myocardial ischemia predicts cardiovascular events in this population, beyond the routine risk prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This figure is comparable to that of other studies. 5,7,8 On the other hand, a low risk of silent CHD, determined by CV risk factors, or a normal ECG are unlikely to be associated with silent CHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparability of our risk estimates with previous studies suggests that differences between East Asian and Western populations in the relative importance of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction in the aetiology of diabetes [ 9 ] have little, if any, impact on associated IHD risk. The method of ascertainment of IHD in the CKB may misclassify a proportion of individuals with “silent” IHD, which is more prevalent among individuals with diabetes [ 24 ], leading to underestimation of diabetes-associated IHD risk. The more modest effects of screen-detected—compared to self-reported—diabetes may reflect the shorter duration of, or less severe glycaemic aberration in, screen-detected diabetes, and greater potential for misclassification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%