2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20011201)92:11<2875::aid-cncr10130>3.0.co;2-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, distribution, and viral load of human papillomavirus 16 DNA in tonsillar carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

34
261
2
28

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
34
261
2
28
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we found an HPV prevalence of 24.3% in our cohort, which is lower than the prevalence in OSCC and tonsillar cancer reported for the USA (45-83%) 4,5 or northern Europe (26-93%), 5,23,24 but comparable to data for central Europe (14-33%) [25][26][27] . We considered HPV-association of samples when high risk HPV-DNA was detected along with p16INK4a expression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In this study, we found an HPV prevalence of 24.3% in our cohort, which is lower than the prevalence in OSCC and tonsillar cancer reported for the USA (45-83%) 4,5 or northern Europe (26-93%), 5,23,24 but comparable to data for central Europe (14-33%) [25][26][27] . We considered HPV-association of samples when high risk HPV-DNA was detected along with p16INK4a expression.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The amount of cancer cells in a biopsy specimen may impact viral load quantitation, and substantial variability may exist in viral load measurements within a single tumor. 29 Additionally, it remains uncertain whether the measurement of viral load is the result of a few cells with greater number of HPV DNA copies, or many cells with few copies. Nonetheless, it seems that estimated viral load might contribute to defining the subset of HPV-positive oral and oropharyngeal cancers that are more likely the result of HPV infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 It has been shown that there are several differences between HPV-positive and -negative headand-neck squamous cell carcinomas. Despite the fact that HPV positivity in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas is an indicator for favorable prognosis, from a clinical point of view these tumors are often poorly differentiated 4,6,[10][11][12] and metastasized to lymph nodes at presentation. 10,11 Furthermore, HPV-positive tumors are often smaller at first diagnosis (diameter r4 cm), 13 and associated with low/no exposure to alcohol and tobacco.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that HPV positivity in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas is an indicator for favorable prognosis, from a clinical point of view these tumors are often poorly differentiated 4,6,[10][11][12] and metastasized to lymph nodes at presentation. 10,11 Furthermore, HPV-positive tumors are often smaller at first diagnosis (diameter r4 cm), 13 and associated with low/no exposure to alcohol and tobacco. 10,11 At the molecular level, the functional inactivation of two key tumor suppressor proteins, ie, p53 and pRb by the HPV-derived oncoproteins E6 and E7, often result in the downregulation of p53, pRb, cyclin D1, and a strong upregulation of p16 INK4A in HPVpositive tumors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation