2022
DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and trends of urolithiasis among adults

Abstract: Purpose of reviewThe purpose of this article is to review and synthesize the current literature on the epidemiology of urolithiasis.Recent findingsThe global patterns of urolithiasis are changing, as the prevalence of urolithiasis appears to be increasing across the world. Geographical variation in the prevalence of urolithiasis is noted across countries and within each country. Although urolithiasis is more common among men and white race, recent data suggests a more prominent rise in the prevalence among wom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Urolithiasis is a prevalent disease with an increasing tendency across the world [ 4 , 5 ]. The prevalence of urolithiasis was estimated to be approximately 12% in North America and 5–9% in Europe [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urolithiasis is a prevalent disease with an increasing tendency across the world [ 4 , 5 ]. The prevalence of urolithiasis was estimated to be approximately 12% in North America and 5–9% in Europe [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been a dramatic increase in its incidence, particularly in developed countries. The rising prevalence of kidney stones substantially burdens healthcare systems worldwide 8–10 . In the United States alone, the total expenditure for kidney stone treatment was approximately $2.1 billion in 2000, which has since risen to an estimated $3.79 billion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urolithiasis affects 5–15% of the world’s population, and the recurrence rate can be as high as 50% within 5–10 years of stone removal and 75% within the next 20 years. Residual fragments (RF) are the most important risk factor for stone recurrence or new stone growth [1]. Traditionally, RF less than 4 mm in diameter are defined as a clinically insignificant RF that can be excreted spontaneously, while RF greater than 4 mm are defined as significant residual fragments that require aggressive treatment [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%