Prevalence and socio‐economic distribution of hazardous patterns of alcohol drinking: study of alcohol consumption in men aged 25–54 years in Izhevsk, Russia

Abstract

AimTo estimate the prevalence of hazardous drinking and its socio-economic distribution among Russian men. Design Participants were an age-stratified, population-based random sample of men aged 25-54 years living in Izhevsk, a city in the Urals, Russia. Interviewers administered questionnaires to cohabiting proxy respondents about behavioural indicators of hazardous drinking derived from frequency of hangover, frequency of drinking beverage spirits, episodes in the last year of extended periods of drunkenness during which the participant withdraws from normal life (zapoi), consumption of alcoholic substances not intended to be drunk (surrogates) and socio-economic position. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between socio-economic position and indicators of hazardous drinking in the past year. Findings Of 1750 men, 79% drank spirits and 8% drank surrogates at least sometimes in the past year; 25% drank spirits and 4% drank surrogates at least weekly and 10% had had an episode of zapoi in the past year. After adjustment for other socio-economic factors, education was strongly associated with indicators of hazardous drinking. Men with the lowest level of education compared to the highest level of education had an odds ratio of surrogate drinking of 7.7 (95% CI 3.2-18.5), of zapoi of 5.2 (2.3-11.8) and of frequent hangover of 3.7 (1.8-7.4). These indicators of hazardous drinking were also independently strongly associated with being unemployed (versus employed) and with levels of household wealth/amenities. Associations of all these variables with daily consumption of beverage spirits were weaker. Conclusion Using a novel range of indicator variables of hazardous drinking, this paper shows that the prevalence of these behaviours is high among working-age men in this Russian city. Moreover, these hazardous behaviours show very clear socio-economic patterns, with particularly high prevalence among those who have had the least education and are not in employment. In contrast, more conventional measures of heavy drinking, based on frequency of consumption of beverage spirits, are less prevalent and show much weaker associations with socio-economic position.

Prevalence and Pattern of Alcohol Consumption using Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in Rural Tamil Nadu, India

“…A study from Russia found that 75% of the men drank spirits [13], while a Thailand study which was done among subjects who were aged 12-65 years, showed the prevalence of current drinkers to be 28.6% [14]. A study which was done in Finland showed the prevalence of hazardous drinking to be 5.8% [15].…”

A Review of Health Consequences of Recessions Internationally and a Synthesis of the US Response during the Great Recession

“…This, again, appears to be concentrated among young men, consistent with prior literature from the Russian financial crisis and other economic downturns, during which men at high risk of unemployment, and with low social support, were at highest risk of alcohol abuse and dependence. 191 By contrast, evidence for the relationship between recessions and chronic health conditions has important methodological limitations. Given that these conditions and their exacerbations take a long time to manifest, it is not surprising that studies that have tried to account for previous health have failed to find strong evidence that these conditions are affected by recessions.…”

Does nativity matter?

“…Rates of tobacco use are also very high in Russia (Perlman et al 2007). Economic difficulties and lower educational status appear to increase these negative practices (Perlman 2010;Tomkins et al 2007). …”