Prevalence and risk variables for peri‐implant disease in Brazilian subjects

Ferreira, Sérgio; Silva, G. L. M; Cortelli, José Roberto; Costa, José Eustáquio da; Costa, Fernando Oliveira

doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.01001.x

Cited by 449 publications

(556 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

490

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Links have been shown to the red complex microorganisms and gram-negative anaerobes who themselves are linked to the progression of periodontal disease as they have been found at the site of the affected areas. 5 It has also been shown that patients who have a history of periodontal disease prior to implant treatment can experience higher rates of peri-implant diseases 6,7 including those with other risk factors such as smoking or diabetes. 8 The aim of treating peri-implantitis is to disrupt the biofilm, detoxify the implant surface and therefore improve surface biocompatibility.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…7,17 This involves mechanically adjusting the exposed implant threads with rotary instruments to reduce the roughness of the surface and therefore minimise future plaque retention. 17,18,19,20 Although it is well accepted that the affected rough implant surface must be altered to minimise the establishment of biofilm, there is no current consensus in the literature regarding a suitable polishing protocol.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The effect of standardised implantoplasty protocol on titanium surface roughness: an in-vitro study

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of standardised implantoplasty protocol on titanium surface roughness: an in-vitro study Abstract: To analyse the changes of surface characteristics of machined and moderately roughened titanium disks following a standardised implantoplasty protocol. Forty titanium discs (machined: n = 20; moderately roughened: n = 20) were instrumented with one half of each disc maintained as the control (non-instrumented). The standardised implantoplasty protocol was carried out using a custom jig with the sequential change of burs: 1) Regular grit diamond [10s], 2) Super-fine grit diamond [10s], 3) Brownie™ silicone polisher [15s], 4) Greenie™ silicone polisher [15s]. Surface topography was analysed using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to measure the elemental profiles of each disc. Quantitative analysis showed similar changes in level of roughness between the machined and moderately roughened titanium discs. CLSM demonstrated an increased roughness (Ra and Sa values) after polishing with a regular grit diamond bur when compared to the uninstrumented surfaces. Although the roughness decreased after the further polishing with the super-fine grit diamond bur, subsequent instrumentation using silicon burs tended to increase the roughness, albeit being statistically insignificant. There was a residue of silicon particles despite the irrigation after each polishing stage. The proposed implantoplasty protocol did not achieve a sufficient level of smoothness on the machined or moderately roughened titanium surfaces when compared to the Ra threshold. Further research is recommended to test the efficacy of each bur on titanium surfaces with longer duration using actual oral implants to allow better comparison.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of standardised implantoplasty protocol on titanium surface roughness: an in-vitro study

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zupnik et al 18 reported that gender was the parameter with the strongest correlation with implant failure in a metaanalysis that demonstrated that males had a higher prevalence of destructive periodontal disease. 19 Because periodontal disease is widely recognized as a risk factor for peri-implantitis and implant failure, 20,21 the higher prevalence of periodontal disease in males may explain the outcome of the study. Anitua et al 22 reported significantly lower survival for implants placed in the maxilla compared to the mandible.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors affecting the survival of implants: a long-term retrospective study

Song

Lee

et al. 2015

J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose:The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term survival of implants retrospectively and determine the risk factors associated with implant failure. Materials and Methods: Of all implants that were placed at the Department of Periodontology of the Dental Hospital of Gangneung-Wonju National University from January 1998 to December 2012, 2265 implants that were followed up until June 2013 were included in this study. Data were collected from clinical and radiographic examinations from previous visits. The information gathered included gender, age, smoking status, implant diameter, implant length, surface of implant, location of implant within the dental arch, surgical techniques and existence of complications. Results: The survival rate before loading was 98.9%. The cumulative survival rate after 5 years of loading was 97.2%, and after 15 years of loading was 95.2%. In a simple logistic regression analysis, gender (P = 0.016), smoking status (P = 0.001), location of implant (P = 0.020) and existence of complications (P = 0.002) were statistically associated with implant failure and included in the multiple regression analysis. As a result of multiple logistic regression analysis, the variables statistically associated with implant failure (P < 0.05) were smoking status (P = 0.049) and existence of complications (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The cumulative survival rate of dental implants after 15 years of loading was 95.2% and that the variables statistically associated with implant failure were smoking status and existence of complications. (J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2015;31(1):10-9)

show abstract

“…It is by definition an infectious disease and the inflammatory lesion in peri-implant tissues develops as a result of accumulation of bacteria on implant surfaces. Some studies reported that peri-implantitis occurs in 28% to 56% of subjects and at 12% to 43% of implant sites (Ferreira et al, 2006;RoosJansaker et al, 2006). The surface roughness and chemical composition of the implant surface are important in bacterial adhesion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Dental Implants Coated with Titanium Nitride: The Experimental Study with Porphyromonas gingivalis Infection

Yamazaki¹,

Mashima²,

Nakazawa³

et al. 2017

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prevalence and risk variables for peri‐implant disease in Brazilian subjects

Abstract: Our data suggest that subjects with periodontitis, diabetes, and poor oral hygiene were more prone to develop peri-implantitis.

Cited by 449 publications

References 42 publications

The effect of standardised implantoplasty protocol on titanium surface roughness: an in-vitro study

The effect of standardised implantoplasty protocol on titanium surface roughness: an in-vitro study

Factors affecting the survival of implants: a long-term retrospective study

Application of Dental Implants Coated with Titanium Nitride: The Experimental Study with Porphyromonas gingivalis Infection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About